I do not disagree with the marriage part but tell me this? If the mother cannot financially support the child do you believe that’s the child best interest? Or the mothers? Because I cannot tell whose side you are on. Is it the child’s best interest or the parent who has full custody? Because if you think I’m against mothers you are wrong. I’m against the parent who has full custody a cannot support the child and ask for government assistance a refuses to let the other parent who can support the child, support the child. Meanwhile they are living off our hard earned tax dollars. While using the child as crutch and complete ruining the other parent’s life.
A realtionship with a mother and child or father and child is not about money. There are very good poor parents who raise amazing children.
A child needs both parents but profiting off a failed relationship is wrong. There are other ways to make sure the child is taken care of by both parents.
Pull the statistics up that show the amount of men that bother to file the paperwork to get custody or modify visitation. I promise you won’t be shocked.
Show me the statistics where a mother has to jump through the same hoops ? I promise you will be shocked.
1 Like
After you, dear. Aferall, you are the one who pulled this “paperwork failure is primary reason” fairy tale from out of your backside; so if there are statistics to going along with it, do present them (including source).
1 Like
You keep making statements based on how you feel about your case but you are not showing anything that results in a policy or actual solution that can be agreed on. Your solution was to blow up the system and stop all child support. That’s not thinking about the children at all. Honestly if I was the Judge in your case you would not be granted custody for that reason. You are not focused on the children. You are focused on yourself and how having to pay for children is negatively impacting your life. You are very focused on how she is hurting you and how you have to pay money. Not on the children.
The Judge and court system is there for the children not the parents. The children come first always. If anyone has to be hurt by the process the Judge is going to try to make sure it is not the children.
If you have solutions that have to do with protecting and taking care of children that’s what it is about.
Otherwise, you made a mistake and you are paying for it. But the children should never be the ones who suffer because of parents not making sure they have a healthy relationship.
The only good news coming is that hopefully over the next couple years with the new Administration the costs of things are going to decrease and become more reasonable which should also help your pocketbook along with everyone else.
Because I have a simple solution. “If the custodial parent cannot afford to take care of the child the best interest of the child would be to offer full custody to the non custodial parent before child support is considered.” Child support is corrupt it needs to be ABOLISHED and a new system set in place that is fair for the child. You’re obviously just here to troll. But I appreciate it because you are keeping this topic alive.
“If I was the judge”
1 Like
Completely disagree with your assessment of what is best for the child. Again, you are focused on money not the child. Poor people have children too. It doesn’t make them bad parents. A parent who is wealthy can be neglectful and the poor parent can be very loving. Saying that money should be the deciding factor ignores what should really be considered. Definitely not in agreement. Good luck.
Welcome to America you have that Right! I hope you never find yourself in that situation.
lol. Your wishes for other people are apparent.
I only wish you the best!
1 Like
Abolish child support