FYI. The UK studied 1.7 million 5-15 year olds and only the mRNA recipients had cardiac issues.
1 Like
Population reduction via gene therapy attack?
1 Like
The problem is they are modifying food and injecting meat animals both as ways to get their mRNA into people who wonât accept a jab. Banning it entirely is the only way to stop them experimenting on the human race.
1 Like
Absolutely Correct Toby. And one of the vectors for mRNA administration is via pork products like breakfast sausage patties and smoked sausages brautwursts, porkchop and pork loin cuts, hotdogs, etc. Below is a link to additional info regarding this new mRNA attack vectorâŚ
Yes, and this population reduction program may have got its start as a bioweapon developed within the United States military.
More belowâŚ
Execute all those created, promoted, aided, facilitated in vaccination. Mass human genocide!
And we should also ban mRNA cancer vaccines.
1 Like
It is imperative that we develop an ethics board around genetic engineering and the release of recombinant genetic products into the human gene pool and into the greater ecological gene pool. NO ONE is talking about this. We have evidence that the man-made genetically engineered genes from the Covid mRNA vaccines are capable of and have integrated themselves into the nuclear genome of humans. This will forever change the genetic blueprint of humanity and possibly other species. This is akin to breaking into the Holy Grail of humanity, akin to the splitting of the atom. Science has no idea of the possible implications for generations to come. In 1985, I was in an Advanced Placement Biology class in high school, preparing to head off to medical school. I made a slight detour into veterinary medicine because of my love for animals. My teacher led us in a round table discussion around the ethical considerations of releasing man-made genes into the environment, never being able to âtake them backâ. If high school students can discuss such topics, where is our scientific leadership in this country!?! Has it all been bought off? I am witnessing thousands of dearly loved dogs and cats being severely and some mortally, injured from a genetically engineered monoclonal antibody product. And the FDA does nothing!
2 Likes
Some mRNA drugs and vaccines are used to cure/treat ailments such as genetic conditions, certain cancers, and are often used as a therapeutic.
Banning all of them simply due to misunderstanding the potential of the specific category of which substances are in the vaccine is a miscalculation of the damage/risk ratio.
Banana - mRNA technology gives foreign materials access to the genetic material within the cell, which can lead to altering or damaging that genetic material, which can then be replicated into other cells through mitotic division. In essence, this takes a single cellular âaccidentâ or propagates it potentially billions of times.
Although I agree that there may be unique treatments which may require unlocking the cell itself to deliver materials, for the most part, conventional treatments never relied on accessing the genetic material within a cell. This is sort of like giving the keys to Pandoraâs Box over to the medical industry, AFTER we already saw what it pulled on the COVID mass genocide attempt.
I think your selling point on possibly loosing some special treatement, as opposed to largely keeping the genetic material of the American People off limits the medical industry, is an acceptable loss.
We already see where the industry wants to goâŚthey want EVERY vaccine to use mRNA tech. Now ask yourself what benefits the American People would gain by moving from regular to flu shots, to mRNA flu shots. This is where the damage can occur, through mass âscrew upsâ. It is kind of hard to do a product recall of a faulty mRNA treatment after it has damaged genetic material and the cell has since replicated a few billion times, recopying that genetic material into other cells through vital body organs â all for a flu shot, huh? NoâŚthere is no miscalculation of the risk/necessity ratio here. We are not questioning the ability of mRNA to open access to the more sensitive areas of our metabolic makeup, just as we are not questioning the effectiveness of a hood on a car, allowing access to the engine. We are hesitant on mRNA because of the unnecessary risks created by it, just as we would question a sloppy mechanic crawling under our hood, trying to fix a small issue and inadvertantly causing the car to become useless after the attempt.
Banning them because of recently proven mass medical incompetance is a good enough reason in the mind of many Americans. We dont toss our car keys over to children, and we donât toss the keys to Pandoraâs Box over to secret Fabian Socialist doctors who foolishly think that there are too many people on the planet. This treatment should NEVER be accepted for general use in our population, and should CERTAINLY not be mandated by politicians.
If one wants mRNA applied to their cellular systems, then they should have to fill out special request forms and enter into a contract between themselves and the âexperimenterâ or institution. This is America, afterallâŚyou should have the right to do any clever or dumb thing you wish, so long as you do not affect others with that decision. However, this specific treatment (a process still in its infancy) should be banned from general practice and the general public because of said risks related to countless unknown variables and dynamics (that you are attempting to downplay, for whatever reason). The risk/reward is simply not there. And if we cannot agree to an outright ban for general use, then, as any highly controlled substance is strictly regulated, mRNA delivery should likewise be a highly controlled and regulated procedure, to include a custom legal notorized contract between doctor and patient, Thus, it should never incorporated into standard/routine vaccinations for the general population.
And we might even take it a step further and create regulations for the pharmacuitical industry that prohibit further collusion in forcing the direction of vaccines by stipulating that it is NOT allowed to offer specialized mRNA treatments if it does not have a readily conventional treatment in place and available to the general population. (e.g. - said company may not market and maintain an mRNA flu vaccine without having a non-mRNA flu vaccine actively available to the public). This would prevent industrial collusion with attempts to gradually phase out regular vaccines and replace them with mRNA-specific vaccines). We know that this is the direction they wish to pursue, and we must block that avenue now, rather that deal with expected market manipulation and unsafe limited choices later.
And lastly, there should be specific regulations and identification criteria applied to ALL new or existing medical technology that attempts to access genetic materials within cells as part of medical treatments. These treatments should fall under a newly designated âspecial classâ of gene-exposure treatments that follow strict applications and guidelines which are outside of normal public consumption, requiring legal and binding contracts prior to administration. All new treatments/drugs that meet such defined criteria must fall under this special class, no matter how the industry might wish to name/rename/rebrand, abbreviate, classify, create special nomenclature, or otherwise suggest, infer, or advertise said treatment/vaccine/drug in apparent efforts to evade/avoid adherence to such âspecial classâ restrictions. This special class should include âlegal as well as medicalâ prescription, which require external signatures/witnesses by notary public or similar, given the clear and provable risks of grave and irreversable genetic mutations and untreatable debilitating injuries. This might please both sides of the aisle, regarding mRNA shots, keeping America safe while at the same time, not hindering medical/technological advancement in the new field. Fair enough? 
I completely understand not wanting mRNA vaccines to be the standard.
But people consent to unconventional treatments all the time for a chance to live a normal and healthy life.
Iâm just saying we canât outright ban something that there isnât enough evidence against, without at least weighing the positive elements.
UnderstoodâŚand I think my last paragraph covered that, right? It should be tightly controlled in special treatments, and banned from general practice. I think you should find agreement in that.
Yes I agree
As long as there are very specific regulations that are maintained, it would work
1 Like
Jacko, he is truly a shining example of a myopic medical deep state idiot, isnât he? He has no clue that the rest of the population is slowly circling around his friends with a hard brow and a stiff rope.
1 Like
Ya know, JackO, not only do we agree, but I do get a definitve sense around these statist folk who attempt to brainwash the rest of society with what is intrinsicly anti-Human. These people are a cult â they are trying to belong to something aside from Humanity because they know, deep down, that they do not fit in. And that cult is now failing before everyone on the planet. These people turned to the Deep State, since they could not find a place in Humanity. Within, they are corrupt and disfunctional â and they know it. They hoped to âcash inâ as a reject of society. Little did they know, that the very cult that they embraced, was destined for destruction. They lie, cheat, and steal. They are the antithesis of Humanity. They are cultists and statists of the Deep State. And now the Titanic Deep State is sinkingâŚdragging them along with it. They are terrified. It has come full circle and the pendulum is swinging back again. They know it and they are horrified. Their hours are numbered â compressed into a short season.
I agree wholeheartedly. End the stabs and provide full disclosure to the population who trusted that these stabs were safe.
Geert Vanden Bossche
A Glimmer of HopeâŚ
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGgyl6yi4k/U8cdrM2jdN2gSKKC9PM7xA/watch?utlId=h445d971697
Here is a little more information for you.
https://x.com/GVDBossche/status/1666705114546188289
https://www.canva.com/design/DAGgyl6yi4k/U8cdrM2jdN2gSKKC9PM7xA/watch?utlId=h445d971697
TheRE are rumors that THE PHARMACEUTICAL industry is attempting to make a communicable mRNA vaccination thatâs would actively shed and spread through those who avoid the jabs. Given the rumors a ban is the only way to go.