Abolition of the Disparate Impact Standard in Federal Law

Liberty Justice
,
1

Policy Title: Equal Treatment and Accountability Act (ETAA)

Objective:
To remove the disparate impact standard from federal anti-discrimination laws to ensure that cases of discrimination are based on demonstrable intent rather than statistical disparities, thereby reinforcing individual accountability, promoting genuine equality, and allowing for decision-making based on merit and qualifications.

Policy Background:
The disparate impact standard, established through judicial interpretations of civil rights laws, allows claims of discrimination based on statistical imbalances even if no discriminatory intent is present. While originally intended to address implicit bias, it has led to several challenges:

  • Erosion of Individual Accountability: Shifting the focus to group-based outcomes detracts from a society that values and judges individuals based on personal character, merit, and actions.
  • Regulatory and Economic Burdens: Compliance with disparate impact mandates imposes unnecessary costs on businesses, educational institutions, and other organizations, forcing them to consider demographic outcomes over objective criteria.
  • Undermining True Equality: By emphasizing statistical representation, the disparate impact standard promotes a divisive focus on group identities, detracting from an environment of equal opportunity.

Policy Proposal:

  1. Amendments to Federal Anti-Discrimination Legislation:

    • Civil Rights Act Revisions:
      Targeted Revisions to the Civil Rights Act of 1964:
      Title VII – Employment Discrimination: Amend provisions in Title VII to clarify that claims of discrimination must demonstrate intentional discrimination rather than rely on statistical disparities or demographic imbalances as proof.
      Title VI – Federally Funded Programs: Adjust Title VI provisions to ensure that disparate impact claims cannot proceed without evidence of intent, affecting entities that receive federal funding.
      Title VIII – Fair Housing Act: Amend sections of Title VIII to require evidence of intentional discrimination in claims related to housing practices, preventing reliance on statistical outcomes alone.
    • Reaffirmation of Intent-Based Discrimination: Establish that claims of discrimination must be based on demonstrable intent, consistent with the original spirit of civil rights legislation, focusing on individual actions and behaviors.

  2. Emphasis on Individual Rights and Free Association:

    • Respect for Decision-Making Autonomy: Ensure that businesses, institutions, and individuals are free to make voluntary decisions based on merit and relevant qualifications, provided they do not intentionally discriminate against any individual.
    • Encouragement of Merit-Based Standards: Promote practices that prioritize skills, performance, and character as primary criteria for evaluation and decision-making.

  3. Reduction of Compliance Burdens for Businesses and Institutions:

    • Scaling Back Federal Statistical Mandates: Reallocate resources currently directed toward disparate impact enforcement, focusing instead on identifying and addressing actual cases of intentional discrimination.

Anticipated Outcomes:

  • Promotion of Equality of Opportunity: Realign the focus on genuine equality by emphasizing opportunity over mandated outcomes, allowing individuals to thrive based on personal efforts and achievements.
  • Enhanced Institutional Efficiency and Productivity: Allow businesses and institutions to operate based on objective standards of merit, reducing regulatory burdens and fostering an environment of innovation and growth.
  • Restoration of Legal Accountability and Fairness: Reinforce the principle of individual responsibility by ensuring that anti-discrimination laws focus on demonstrable intent rather than statistical group outcomes.

Conclusion:
The “Equal Treatment and Accountability Act (ETAA)” aims to restore the original intent of anti-discrimination legislation by focusing on individual actions and qualifications rather than statistical representation. By abolishing the disparate impact standard, this policy emphasizes personal responsibility, efficiency, and the equal treatment of all individuals under the law.