Redefining Full-Time: The Case for a 32-Hour Workweek

I propose that a 32-hour workweek should become the new standard for full-time employment. This change could increase employment opportunities, allow citizens more time with their loved ones, and promote a healthier work-life balance.

Currently, many independent workers earning minimum wage have to work 240 hours a month just to save an estimated $15,000 annually. This requires an additional 80 hours of labor each month on top of the standard 160 hours of full-time work, which only covers basic living expenses. These extra hours come at the expense of building meaningful relationships and personal well-being.

Stress, which is a leading cause of chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, and mental health disorders, is exacerbated by the relentless demands of overwork. Overworking not only drains physical and mental health but also diminishes productivity, creativity, and overall job satisfaction.

Furthermore, this shift to a 32-hour workweek would complement the ‘no tax on overtime’ policy by enabling workers to keep more of their additional earnings without being penalized for needing to work extra hours. Together, these changes would provide workers with the financial flexibility to cover living expenses while also prioritizing their health and relationships.

A shorter workweek would also address systemic inequalities. Many workers in lower-income brackets cannot afford to prioritize rest or leisure, while those in higher-income roles often have more flexibility. This imbalance contributes to a widening gap in health, happiness, and economic stability.

By fostering a culture that values health, family, and community, a 32-hour workweek could reduce burnout, boost overall productivity, and improve mental health outcomes. This shift would ultimately lead to a more balanced, equitable, and sustainable society.

Policies like the 40-hour workweek and labor protections were once considered radical, yet they were successfully implemented. Similarly, a phased or industry-specific rollout of a 32-hour workweek, supported by government initiatives such as tax incentives or offsets for any lost revenue, could help businesses adapt, maintain operations, and ensure consistency across industries during the transition. To ensure workers are not financially impacted, this shift would also include wage adjustments, guaranteeing that employees maintain their current income while working fewer hours. Additionally, tax incentives could be introduced for landlords and homeowners to lower housing costs, helping to decrease the overall cost of living and further support workers in achieving financial stability.