Proposal to re-evaluate what constitutes a felony charge. forever burdening ones personal life

Proposal for Reevaluating the Definition of a Felony Charge

pretext-
[I would like to mention here that some cases and charges should absolutely stick, such as sexual assault, big drug busts, credit card fraud, and others that directly impacted someone else’s life for the worse. I am not suggesting we remove the felony scale I am simply suggesting we remove petty crimes as some people’s lives get ruined over silly charges such as having a certain amount of marijuana in an illegal state.]

Executive Summary

The current legal framework governing what constitutes a felony charge warrants a critical reevaluation. Over the years, certain petty offenses have been elevated to felony status, often driven by financial incentives for government entities rather than the pursuit of justice. This practice has unnecessarily devastated the lives of countless individuals, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities, and undermining public trust in the legal system. This proposal seeks to establish a task force to redefine felony thresholds and ensure that the classification of crimes aligns with principles of fairness, proportionality, and public interest.


Background and Problem Statement

Felonies are the most severe category of criminal offenses, traditionally reserved for acts causing significant harm to individuals or society, such as violent crimes, fraud, or substantial theft. However, in recent decades, a growing number of minor infractions—such as shoplifting, certain traffic violations, and even non-violent drug offenses—have been categorized as felonies. Examples include:

  • Petty Theft and Shoplifting: In some jurisdictions, theft of items valued at $500 or less can result in felony charges. This disproportionately impacts individuals facing economic hardship and offers little benefit to the public.
  • Non-Violent Drug Offenses: Simple possession of small quantities of certain substances has historically been classified as a felony, leading to mass incarceration without addressing underlying issues like addiction or systemic inequality.
  • Administrative Violations: Activities such as failure to report minor regulatory infractions (e.g., fishing without a proper license) have been elevated to felony status, often as a means to generate revenue through fines or asset forfeiture.

These policies disproportionately harm individuals who lack the financial resources to navigate the justice system effectively. A felony conviction results in long-term consequences, including barriers to employment, housing, and voting rights, effectively punishing individuals long after they have served their sentence.


Objectives

  1. Reassess and Redefine Felony Thresholds: Establish clear and reasonable guidelines for differentiating between felonies and misdemeanors, focusing on the severity and impact of the crime.
  2. Reduce Financial Incentives for Overcharging: Investigate and address the role of government revenue generation in the escalation of petty crimes to felony status.
  3. Promote Rehabilitation Over Punishment: Prioritize alternative sentencing for non-violent, low-level offenders to reduce recidivism and support reintegration into society.

Proposed Actions

  1. Establish a Bipartisan Task Force:

    • Comprising legal experts, criminologists, community representatives, and affected individuals.
    • Tasked with reviewing current felony classifications and identifying areas for reform.
  2. Analyze Data on Felony Convictions:

    • Collect and analyze statistics on felony charges for petty crimes, examining patterns of disproportionate impact on specific demographics.
  3. Engage Public Input:

    • Host public forums to gather input from affected communities and legal practitioners.
  4. Implement Legislative Reforms:

    • Introduce laws to recalibrate felony thresholds (e.g., raising the monetary threshold for theft to reflect inflation and economic realities).
    • Decriminalize certain non-violent offenses, such as minor drug possession, and reclassify them as misdemeanors.
  5. Monitor and Evaluate Outcomes:

    • Regularly assess the impact of reforms to ensure they reduce overcharging without compromising public safety.

Expected Outcomes

  1. Reduced Incarceration Rates: By reclassifying low-level offenses, fewer individuals will enter the prison system for crimes that pose minimal harm to society.
  2. Improved Public Trust in Justice: A fairer and more proportionate legal system will foster greater public confidence.
  3. Enhanced Economic and Social Equity: Fewer barriers for individuals with minor criminal records will lead to better opportunities for employment and community reintegration.

Conclusion

Reevaluating what constitutes a felony charge is not only a moral imperative but also a practical one. It is time to prioritize justice over financial incentives and to restore fairness to a system that has needlessly disrupted the lives of good people. By redefining felony thresholds, we can create a legal framework that upholds accountability while offering pathways to rehabilitation and equity.

We urge policymakers to support this initiative and work collaboratively toward a more just and equitable society.

1 Like

Truly victimless crimes may be expunged, sure – but how many truly victimless crimes are being prosecuted? Often the taxpayers are the victims, even if a petty offense or administrative violation.

Any business getting ripped off won’t have much sympathy for shop lifters.

Most of the people in the clink are there for good reason.

Sure, however, there are certainly cases that do not merit a felony. Did the man who spent 5 years in prison for dating a 17 year old when he was 19 even though they met in high school and were together for 5 years deserve the prison and felony because her mother cried wolf? was that a good reason? or let’s say my ex-boyfriend who did two years and got a felony for growing marijuana in an illegal state for his chronic inflammatory pain? does he deserve the prison time or felony? there are clearly errors in the system and I would argue a good 25% of prisoners do not deserve their sentence. If you can think critically enough to follow the money, you’ll see the incentivization that exists for judges and other officials such as prosecutors to serve time over justice. the system is broken. This isn’t about personal opinion. it’s a matter of justice and injustice.

There are certainly unrealistic and dumb prosecutions on non-threats to society, by overzealous law enforcement in judicial speed traps. [I’m not condoning anything illegal.]

My point is very few of those are sapping the state or localities to the extent of serious crime, but all overhead is a cost.

Can we flatten penalties and ease compliance? That depends on the community and what they deem progress.

I’d make deliberate public littering a six month stay in the county lockup, but that’s just me.