Drastically Speed Up Court Case Hearings That Have Constitutional Violation Arguments

Liberty
1

Create an 'Emergency Fast Track” alternative and special mandatory “Has Standing” case status to existing and future court cases that contain arguments regarding fundamental Constitutional Rights violations of the American People.

Under the current process, court cases involving violations against protections afforded under the U.S. Constitution, are unnecessarily drug out for extended periods – even years or decades, only to reach the Supreme Court, where the case is simply thrown out due to “lack of standing”. The case is stalled for years and finally buried. Many of these cases involve State and Local government Constitutional violations of its residents. This “stall and bury” tactic must come to an end so that the rights of the People (via speedy trial) be addressed immediately.

In order to design and administer an ‘Emergency Fast Track’ avenue (aka: a ‘fast lane’) for these special cases of presumed Constitutional violations, past cases might be examined for procedural delays, and judicial methods and procedures be modified and/or removed in order to rapidly escalate these special cases up through the court system and onto the Supreme Court, where they cannot be dismissed, but must be quickly examined and ruled on through a strict ‘Constitutional lens’.

Today’s antiquated, cumbersome, and drawn out judicial processes must not impede the rapid implementation of Constitutional protections when they are most needed. Constitutional violations represent an “emergency”, and just like medical emergencies, “judicial emergencies” should be treated with similar rapid emergency response teams and processes.

11 Likes
2

The default position of the courts should be to enjoin any law or actions until procen constitutional

2 Likes
3

Great idea. This should be amended as part of the 6th amendment.

1 Like
4

Great post. The one item missing is we already have the Rights to Constitutional Common Law Courts. The challenge is we as the sovereign do not demand our Common Law Rights. We consent to the Article 1 courts which are all administrative courts. These administrative courts do not see, hear or abide by the constitution. They judge by administrative statutes. Administrative statutes are the only defense one can bring within these courts. That is why when you you bring up constitutional rights you get shut down and told you have no standing within this court. It is imperative that we learn how to stand on our inalienable rights to demand an Article 3 Common Law court.

1 Like
5

Yes please! My Constitutional Rights have been violated horrifically! This is a must!