Air Traffic Control hiring reform

Background:
I am a current certified professional controller with over 20 years of experience working CONUS, OCONUS, military, and civilian Air Traffic Control

Problem 1:
ATC staffing shortages are directly impacting the safety and efficiency of the NAS resulting in massive losses in revenue generation and exponentially compounding both risks and safety issues. The current plan to hire more controllers will not ever outpace retirement and withdrawal numbers due to training bottlenecks and non-competitive salaries. Further compounding this issue is that due to the complexity and intensity of ATC many controllers will wash out months or years down the road costing the agency time and resources.

Current bottleneck 1:
ATC hiring process currently requires ALL off the street hired controllers to attend training in Oklahoma City. This training is largely viewed as not beneficial (due to the local training requirements that can’t be taught in a broad environment) furthermore the capacity of the schoolhouse limits throughput and results in hires being offered employment in geographic locations that are not ideal for their quality of life, and costs the agency millions of dollars in transportation expenses to get employees to the schoolhouse.

Solution 1:
ATC facilities level 7 and below are granted one training specialist position who’s sole purpose will be to train direct hires on local regulations and basic ATC knowledge. (this position will only be activated when there is a need and will be completive bidding from active facility controllers, while teaching the class controllers will earn 20% training pay and return to the boards once controllers are completed fundamentals)These facilities should be able to post direct local hiring offers in their immediate area with the job listing stating failure at any point in early training will result in termination of employment, and relocation expenses will not be paid resulting dramatic cost savings for the FAA .

Problem 2:
Air traffic controllers are resigning from the career field at lower level facilities due to non-competitive salaries, high geographic cost of living and inability to move to higher level facilities. Solution 1 would dramatically increase lower level facility controllers ability to move to higher level facilities once manning shortages catch up (approximately one year) Current ATC transfer policy is random at best, and corrupt at worst.

Solution 2:
Increase the rate at which experienced controllers accrue raises to match compensation with skills. This should be a straight numbered salary raise and not based on percentages as controllers at higher level facilities already receive substantial compensation. Additionally, give controllers with longer time at facilities priority when it comes to transfer requests.

2 Likes

I completely agree with you! Local Hiring is the solution

ATC Hiring is a complete joke. The FAA has been using the same hiring model as long as I can remember, for reference I started ATC in 1990.

Example of how to make a qualified controller:
Start with 100 qualified trainees, send them to Oklahoma City OK MMAC for 3-4 months.
Half washout/fail, that has been the average for decades. now you have 50 trainees
Those 50 trainees are offered ATC facilities around the states and US Territories that most don’t want to be.
Here they are in those facilities they don’t want to be and most cannot afford to live (Bay Area Coastal California) on a trainee pay scale 60,000 a year. It’s average 2-3 years to certify.
Of those 50 left about half washout/ fail so we end up with about 25-35 certified controllers
Why such a high washout rate? Could be many reasons, please let me know???
My bias opinion being ATC in the Bay Area are those being sent to facilities they don’t want to be find loop holes to the “system”, ERR/NECPT/? process.
There are a few legit reasons people want to relocate but it should not be the Agency’s problem. All over the private sector if you have a personal issue and need to move it’s not your employer who needs to carry the burden of having to move you. You can quit and find another job in the place you need to be. Especially if you’re a trainee.

The FAA Academy in Oklahoma City is a waste of tax payers dollars. The solution is local hiring. It would solve the issue of academy graduates (not yet controllers) wanting to leave the high cost of living here.
Hire local talent, Hire them as contract Ghost Pilots(GP) vet them as GP for 6 months to a year. Put them through your local Stage 2-3 training while they’re GP in a training lab.
From there you can see if the future controller can see if ATC is for them or not.
You can see what skills they have naturally and which ones you can work on prior to them setting up to the next level (Hired as an FAA trainee)
The benefit from them being local they will most likely be living with a family member or in a sustainable situation so they will not have that mental distraction.
The OKC MMAC ATC Training Program is not effective. Doing the same thing for over 40 decades expecting a diffent result is INSANITY!!!