Supposedly there is zero point energy, free energy, and advanced-technology patents. Supposedly the US is 100 to 1000 years behind the technological exponential curve. We need to release the flood-gates of technology by removing secrecy of patents and work on inventions and innovations that will allow the US to excellerate technological advancements and capabilities. Therefore, I propose the elimination of any gatekeeping by agencies, entities, and secrecy over patents. Release the patents that entities and individuals want to share with the world so the US can grow technologically, utilize free energy, and release human-expansion to explore space and interdimensional travel (past the outer limits of the Pais Effectâs Shwinger Limit/Effect which releases light from the natural zeropoint energy frield, which is the supposed same effect at the edge of black holes which supposedly lets you break past our known dimension).
Do you have any genuine evidence to back up these â â supposed â â claims?
Rumors in the engineering community. I encourage people to do their own research. Many people also make videos on this topic.
What basis in reality is there for âFree Energyâ?
Surely youâve done research. Even a simple Youtube search will do. Itâs a simple as a circuts of magnets. Itâs as simple as collecting electrons on a copper coil from ionized air. Do some basic digging and youâll find some supposed methods or theories.
If itâs that easy to research it, then doesnât that undermine the entire basis of this proposal?
No, refer to initial thesis.
Youâre going to have to clarify.
See, Iâm having a hard time buying into the basic premise - the idea that somehow, the United States Government is hoarding a bunch of patents that would somehow jump us leaps and bounds into the future if only they were released to the public.
However, youâre not explaining why those patents are just being kept secret and not being used.
Nor are you even bothering to explain why it is that somehow only the United States has access to that secret technology and that nobody else in the world could possibly discover it and basically render the supposed US Secret Patent conspiracy null and void in a way that would hurt even the people who are supposedly keeping the patents secret.
And on top of all that, youâre claiming that somehow, thereâs just enough information out there in the open for people to somehow âknowâ that this technology exists, but at the same time itâs conveniently just enough to know it exists but not enough that anyone could possibly create the technology even without the patents being released.
Again, all while operating on the assumption that somehow, the US has a monopoly on these patents and that nobody else on Earth anywhere could ever recreate any of this technology.
All the while either ignoring or overlooking the fact that patents have a limited lifespan anyway that is significantly shorter than copyright.
So please, explain for me how all that logic computes.
Actually explain it, donât try to weasel out of a real answer by claiming youâve somehow explained it or telling me to do my own research.
Explain for me, in your own words, how what you are claiming makes any sense.
Those who know, know I suppose. Watch more Cspan. Have a good day.
So youâre unable to back up your position, then.
SAWS, which stands for Sensitive Application Warning System, was a program used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). It was not an official âpatent policyâ in the sense of setting rules for what could be patented, but rather an internal procedure for handling and disapproving certain patent applications.
Hereâs a breakdown of SAWS:
- Purpose: SAWS was designed to flag patent applications that were considered âsensitiveâ due to their potential for high publicity, significant impact on the patent community, or controversial subject matter. This allowed for additional review and scrutiny of these applications.
- Criteria: The criteria for SAWS designation were broad and somewhat subjective. They included inventions that:
- Could generate unwanted media coverage.
- Disclosed seemingly frivolous or silly subject matter.
- Had claims of broad or pioneering scope.
- Claimed to prevent or cure previously incurable diseases.
- Claimed to harness zero point energy.
- Claimed to harness energy from the ether.
- Over unity devices.
- Perpetual motion devices.
- Pyramid energy.
- Electroculture/Electrogardening systems.
- Orgone energy systems.
- Cold fusion.
- Process: When an examiner identified a potentially sensitive application, it was referred to a Point of Contact (POC) for review. If the POC agreed, a report was sent to Technology Center Directors, who made the final decision on SAWS designation. SAWS-marked applications underwent additional review by multiple parties, which could significantly delay the patent process.
- Criticism: SAWS was criticized for its lack of transparency and the potential for subjective bias in its application. Critics argued that it could stifle innovation by delaying or discouraging patents on potentially groundbreaking technologies.
- Discontinuation: The USPTO officially discontinued the SAWS program in the early 2010s. However, the USPTO still has internal procedures for reviewing applications that raise sensitive issues or require additional scrutiny.
In summary, SAWS was an internal USPTO program for flagging and reviewing potentially sensitive patent applications. It was not a formal patent policy but rather an internal procedure that has since been discontinued. While SAWS is no longer in use, the USPTO continues to have mechanisms in place to ensure the quality and validity of issued patents, especially those that may be considered controversial or of significant public interest.
Should probably ask if a secret patent is even valid?
Considering part of the patent process it does give 20 years to the owner but they also have to write the patent so that it could be re-created from the patent itself. if you are filing a patent and their secret patents on it you donât know about those and you canât put them in your prior art
supposedly? Laws of thermodynamics? just nuts.
This may also apply with regards to the practice of locking down patents forever and restricting innovation and technological progress. Link provided:
They do withhold energy secrets. What and why we can only speculate.
With all these secrecies, I imagine they are dramatically holding back our progression with technology and innovation.
It would be great to move into an era where we dont rely on energy companies anymore. Instead, households can generate their own energy and perhaps get paid to add energy into the grid whenever needed in the case of blackouts, power failure, or natural disasters. I also believe energy companies should not go away entirely. It should be left as an option for those who dont have the capabilities of generating their own energy.
Back to the point, we need to open the flood gates of revealing patents and stop the strangling of technological progress. This will help eliminate inflation, release new businesses and jobs, and get the country to where it should of been with the exponential curve of technological growth over time.
I believe we should of been a space traveling species by now. If not cultivating and terriforming Mars at the least. We need to make these leaps. We need the technological rennaisaunce.
If households can generate their own energy, then it would be trivial for other places to generate their own energy, basically rendering the âenergy gridâ null and void since everyone is just generating their own energy.
Frankly, I find this idea highly suspect.
The idea that the US Government is actively sitting on genuine technological developments for the sole purpose of doing nothing with them, actively knowingly holding the entire world back, while assuming that either every other entity on Earth is either incapable of developing any of the same advances or going along with also holding themselves back in spite of the obvious leg up it would give them to actually jump ahead of the rest of the world with these supposed amazing scientific advancements.
Sorry, nothing about this passes the smell test for me.
Reminds me of when people complained about how the electric car was being âsuppressedâ; well look, now we actually have electric cars en mass and guess what? Theyâre terrible and the government has to actually twist peopleâs arms to try to force them upon the masses who have decided they actually prefer gas-powered cars to the supposedly âinferiorâ gas cars of the past.
Iâm basically seeing a scenario where people want something to be true more than it actually being true.
- Patents are not secret. They are published. Even applications that havenât received any patent coverage are published in most cases.
- There is absolutely no evidence for any of these claims of âfree energyâ, âzero-point energyâ, or the like.
- There are indeed rules at the patent office that make it impossible to patent perpetual motion machines and other supposed inventions that violate the laws of thermodynamics. This is because the patent office has actual work to do in evaluating claims that are feasible and doesnât have time to waste on impossibilities; until they put those rules in place, they were overwhelmed with such nonsensical âinventionsâ.
P.S. âHad claims of broad or pioneering scopeâ is not one of those rules. I have personally created inventions that have been granted broad claims in otherwise unexplored regions of computer science. Itâs hard to get such claims allowed because there arenât very many areas of any scientific interest that havenât been mined pretty thoroughly, but if you can prove that your invention is really new you can get it allowed.
Hope that helps.
You can believe what you want, but due to the lack of transperency, fedâs behavioral track-record, mainstream peopleâs dissatisfactions, lack of ethical oversight and accountability, collusion with dangerous entities like the wef, entanglment of forign interest, and how there are tons of stories about peopleâs patents and important documents for things theyâve made dissapearing or getting taken away by the supposed âmen-in-blackâ, and sometimes the supposedly mysterious life-threatening circumstances from supposed inventors, I am lead to believe there are major cover ups, possible corruptions, and gate-keeping. Now, I could be wrong and thatâs fine for me, but I just dont believe the proposed circumstances due to the lack of real accountability and mainstream public trust.
It would be worth the transperency and investigation of why many patents are supposedly kept secret. If there was a way to advocate in publicly-made labels or classification systems of why patents are kept secret, with majority-public approval and agreement, without specific or confidential info from patents, and the agreement if a patent should be labeled as extremely non-safe and should be out of the hands of âbad peopleâ who can abuse a patent, then I would advocate for those measures as a policy (within reason and approval-of-access to confidential material with individuals that are not criminals, psychopaths, sociopaths, or who poses a potential threat). This kind of system and access makes sense to me. As of right now, secrecy in patents with all these gate-keeping entities, programs, or agencies makes no sense. Obviously the mainstream American population did not voted for this. Itâs likly part of the secrecy and intelligence complex the mainstream American population also did not vote for, therefore I believe this current secrecy of patent system should not exist. The US is supposedly supposed to be a constitutional and democratically-elected-representative republic. Itâs not a pure-democracy, oligarchy, socialist, or any authoritarian system. The US needs to uphold those values and maintain or return power to the people to which should have access to the patents others want to share without and form of secrecy or gate-keeping. There shouldnât be a system in which entities, programs, or agencies seemingly control the US population by controlling its access to potential technological advancment. The USâs technological advancment depends on its access to patents. Hopefully, we can see more transperency and give people access to all or most patents that are willing or desired to be shared without barriers.
OK, but you really need to work on your argument.
As stands, you havenât really answered any of the issues I have with your core proposal. Your argument currently mostly comes down to âThe government isnât transparent, so I can believe whatever I wantâ, even when what you want to believe makes no sense from a scientific or logical standpoint.