Censorship is censorship, no matter how you try to sugarcoat and justify it.
Women watch porn, as well, thus it might be as reasonable to expect they are influenced as much men. The premise is thus flawed.
Next, we can ban the advertising of trucks and sports cars, because men might become enamored with them…then we could ban advertising electronics because men spend way to much on electronics, also indicating addictive behaviors.
People, men included, are not going to become more interested in something less interesting because some busy body banned the more interesting subject matter. It will only force the more jnteresting subject matter underground…beyond control.
It wouldn’t hurt to stop forcing porn onto people whom aren’t amused by the public display of porn though. People generally don’t want porn shoved in their faces involuntarily. It can become just plain gross.
Does anyone remember Lenny Bruce being arrested for public profanity? Yet rap music promotes all manner of violence and profanity.
Legal decency bans tend to be grossly biased and generally does not work.
Anal knowledge, as an example, is banned in many places where homosexuality is openly practiced, even by lawmakers. So, how did THAT work out? …Sort of like banning alcohol during prohibition is how that worked out.
It may be gross but can it really be effectively banned? This is going to turn out like “No child left behind” and the “War on drugs”.
When the Federal Government gets involved, things get worse, money us wasted and eventually the people get sick of the hypocracy and the project is scrapped.
Can we just skip the Government regulation and wasting of tax dollars? Let’s just feed a hungry veteran with those tax dollars.
Would you be content to curtail the public display or porn on non-consenting audiences?