According to 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22, “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.”
In other words, companies that manufacture vaccines are not liable if someone has an allergic reaction or injury after being vaccinated.
.
As the BIOWEAPON was NOT “properly prepared” and, as the information paper within the distributed vials was INTENTIONALLY left blank, and no “directions and warnings” WHATSOEVER accompanied these vials, then it stands to reason that any alleged “IMMUNITY” would not apply, yes? Damn, wouldn’t it be great to have a class action lawsuit started?
I believe the mismanagement that occurred here was rooted with the decision makers pushing a vaccine even though Ivermectin and Hydroxycholorquine were requested as possible treatments; both of which already experienced clinical trials and ready to use. The malpractice I believe leads back to not using existing tested medications and the decision makers here that need to answer questions.
With respect to the vaccines, I would like to have confirmation on what was exactly being innoculated, the side effects, and how we can develop something that would counter the damage or neutralize the effects. I would also like to know, who and how it was determined on the amount of time and number of boosters.