The shadow Government explained. The web of fake Charities:
Many charities in the United States are abusing their non-profit status to spread political agendas, influence media narratives, and manipulate public opinion. These organizations have turned into political machines, using taxpayer money to push hidden agendas and fund fake jobs for insiders.
In the Netherlands, some government-funded charities have used public money to sue their own government. They collaborate with media outlets like Volkskrant and AD.nl, RTLNIEUWS, NOS to create emotional stories that shape public opinion and sway policies. Similar issues are happening in the United States, where certain charities and media work together to push political narratives disguised as charity work.
This act aims to hold charities accountable by investigating government-funded organizations, revoking their tax-exempt status if they engage in political activities, and exposing hidden media connections that influence public opinion. The goal is to protect taxpayer money and ensure that charities focus on helping people, not manipulating politics.
Why This Act is Necessary
Charities are meant to provide assistance to those in need. However, many have become politically motivated organizations that use their influence to shape public opinion and policies. These organizations influence media narratives, create emotional stories to sway public opinion, and use taxpayer money to sue governments.
Charities that engage in political activities should no longer enjoy tax-free benefits. The public deserves transparency in how these organizations operate, who they employ, and what influence they have on media and government policies.
Emotional Media Manipulation by Charities
One of the most common tactics used by some charities is emotional manipulation.
When immigration policies are enforced by Republican administrations, these charities often bring crying families and emotional stories to the media to create public backlash. These stories are strategically published when right-leaning governments are in power.
For example, during President Trump’s administration, media outlets shared stories of children being separated from their families at the border. These reports often lacked full context and were amplified by immigration charities to paint a specific narrative.
When similar policies are enforced under Democratic administrations, these stories receive little to no media attention. This emotional manipulation is a political strategy, not charity work, and it must be exposed.
Key Actions in This Act
- Investigate and Audit All Government-Funded Charities
Every charity that receives taxpayer money must undergo a full audit. This audit will ensure that these charities are not engaging in political activities, spreading biased information, or creating fake jobs for family members. - Revoke Tax-Exempt Status for Political Charities
Any charity found to be pushing political narratives or engaging in lawsuits against the government will lose their tax-exempt status. They will be required to pay taxes like any other political organization. - Require Media Transparency on Charity Reports
Media outlets must disclose any financial ties they have with charities used as sources of information. If a media outlet receives charity funding to push political narratives, it will be publicly listed and investigated. - Ban Charities from Suing Governments with Public Money
Charities should not be allowed to use taxpayer money to sue the government. Any charity wishing to take legal action must use private funds, not government grants. - Investigate Charity Involvement in Emotional Media Campaigns
A full investigation will be conducted to identify charities that collaborate with media outlets to push emotional stories with political agendas. These campaigns must be exposed for what they are—political activism, not charity work. - Expose Fake Jobs and Family Hires in Charities
Charities must disclose their full employee lists and salaries. Any charity found to be creating fake jobs or hiring family members for high-paying roles without duties will face fines, legal action, and loss of tax-exempt status.
Real-World Examples of Charity Abuse
- The Netherlands
In the Netherlands, some government-funded charities have used taxpayer money to sue the government. These organizations work closely with media outlets to push political narratives on immigration, climate change, and social policies.
Media outlets like Volkskrant and AD.nl frequently use charity-backed reports to justify biased reporting without disclosing the political motivations behind these reports.
- United States Immigration Charities
In the U.S., immigration charities have worked with media outlets to create emotional stories about children at the border during President Trump’s administration. These stories were amplified to create public backlash against immigration policies, even though similar policies existed under Democratic administrations.
This double standard must be addressed. Media outlets and charities should be held accountable for pushing politically motivated narratives while presenting themselves as neutral.
Investigate U.S. Charities and Media Ties
This act will also investigate which charities have direct access to the White House and Congress. It will review how these charities are using that access and whether they are funding political narratives through media outlets.
The recent omnibus bill must be reviewed to identify all charity projects funded by taxpayer money. The public deserves to know where their money is going and what projects are being funded.
Protecting Democracy and Public Money
This act is about protecting democracy by ensuring that taxpayer money is not used to manipulate public opinion or fund political activism.
Charities that act like political organizations must be treated as such and pay taxes accordingly. Media outlets must disclose their ties to charities and ensure that their reporting is unbiased and based on facts, not political agendas.
Conclusion
The Charity Accountability Act will end the abuse of tax-exempt charities that engage in political activities and manipulate public opinion through emotional media stories. It will expose hidden media connections, prevent emotional manipulation, and ensure that taxpayer money is spent on real charity work, not political propaganda.
The American people deserve transparency in how their money is being spent. Charities should focus on helping people, not influencing elections or spreading biased information.
It is time to hold these organizations accountable and bring transparency to the charity sector once and for all.