End the Patriot Act, surveillance on Americans and TSA

It’s time to end the Patriot Act, remove TSA from American airports and prosecute surveillance of Americans without a warrant.

23 Likes

Absolutely needs to be fully disbanded. This was already drafted and ready “in the hopper” - they just were waiting for the right “problem” for them to offer their “solution.” Complete government overreach.

4 Likes

Definitely agree. There is also other legislation such as the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act (RISAA), a bill that would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) for two years and greatly expand the federal government’s power to conduct electronic surveillance, including of Americans.

1 Like

I’m all for it, but I feel the TSA is a necessary evil.

1 Like

Yes, This must be stopped. We the citizens of America should have freedom that is what we are known for and the surveilance and spying on American citizens has to stop.

3 Likes

Please see this related post:

The TSA’s Performance and the Path to Improved Airport Security

Introduction

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was established in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks to enhance airport security and prevent future acts of terrorism. However, the TSA has faced repeated criticism and scrutiny regarding its effectiveness and efficiency. This paper examines the TSA’s repeated failures to pass Inspector General evaluations, provides a brief history of airport security prior to the TSA’s establishment, and explores pathways to returning to a more efficient, less costly, less invasive, and more effective screening process.

A Brief History of Airport Security Before TSA

Before the TSA was created in 2001, airport security was primarily managed by individual airlines and private security companies. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) set basic security standards, but enforcement varied widely, leading to inconsistent security practices. Key events, such as the hijacking of planes in the 1970s and the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 in 1988, prompted gradual improvements in security measures, including the introduction of metal detectors and baggage screening.

Despite these measures, the lack of a centralized authority meant that security protocols were often reactive rather than proactive. This fragmented approach left vulnerabilities that could be exploited by terrorists, culminating in the devastating attacks of September 11, 2001, which underscored the need for comprehensive reform in aviation security.

TSA’s Establishment and Initial Goals

In response to the 9/11 attacks, the TSA was created under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act. The agency was tasked with overseeing security for all modes of transportation, with a focus on airports and commercial aviation. Its initial goals included standardizing security procedures, improving screening technology, and enhancing passenger safety.

Repeated Failures in Inspector General Evaluations

Despite its mission, the TSA has struggled to meet its objectives, as evidenced by repeated failures to pass evaluations conducted by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General (OIG). Key findings include:

  1. Inconsistent Screening Procedures: The OIG has consistently highlighted issues with inconsistent application of screening protocols across different airports, leading to vulnerabilities in the security process.

  2. Failures in Threat Detection: In a series of covert tests, the OIG revealed that TSA screeners failed to detect a significant percentage of prohibited items, including weapons and explosives. Reports indicated that undercover agents successfully smuggled dangerous items through security checkpoints, raising concerns about the effectiveness of TSA screening.

  3. Resource Inefficiencies: The TSA has been criticized for misallocating resources, such as deploying advanced screening technologies that are not effectively integrated into the existing security framework. These inefficiencies lead to longer wait times for passengers and increased operational costs.

  4. Budget Constraints and Staffing Issues: The TSA has faced budget constraints that have impacted its ability to hire and retain qualified personnel. High turnover rates and inadequate training have further compromised the agency’s ability to maintain effective security operations.

Path to a More Efficient and Effective Screening Process

To address these challenges and return to a more efficient, less costly, and less invasive airport security process, several strategies can be considered:

  1. Decentralization of Security Operations: Reverting to a model where airports have more autonomy in managing their own security can foster innovation and responsiveness to local risks. This approach allows for tailored security measures that align with specific airport needs.

  2. Enhanced Use of Technology: Investing in advanced screening technologies that improve threat detection without compromising passenger convenience is essential. Systems that utilize artificial intelligence and automated processes can streamline security checks.

  3. Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging collaboration between the TSA and private security firms can lead to the sharing of best practices and resources. This partnership can enhance training and operational efficiency while maintaining high security standards.

  4. Focus on Risk-Based Security: Shifting toward a risk-based security model allows for more targeted screening processes, concentrating resources on higher-risk passengers and cargo while facilitating smoother experiences for the majority of travelers.

  5. Improved Training and Staffing: Addressing staffing shortages through competitive hiring practices and comprehensive training programs can enhance the effectiveness of security personnel. Ensuring that screeners are well-trained and equipped to handle evolving security threats is critical.

Conclusion

The TSA’s repeated failures to meet Inspector General evaluations highlight the need for a reassessment of airport security practices. By learning from the past and adopting a more decentralized, efficient, and risk-based approach, we can create a screening process that prioritizes both security and passenger experience. A return to a system that emphasizes effectiveness over bureaucracy may ultimately lead to safer and more efficient air travel for all.

Remove digital ID and STOP scanning faces at the airport at checkpoints. I was told by an agent that the photos will become permanently filed this year. This must be undone.