Do away with the NFA (National Firearms Act) of 1934

The National Firearms Act of 1934 was a law passed after the gangsters of Chicago and the St Valentines Day massacre made it onto the headlines of newspapers of the day and it shocked the conscience of the Nation.

That law was Unconstitutional then, and is Unconstitutional now according to the Heller decision of what was/is in common use at the time.
The $200.00 tax stamp of the time was certainly egregious and continues to be.
But that’s not the only reason for the elimination of the NFA.
The SBS (Short Barrel Shotgun) is an NFA item.
The SBR (Short Barrel Rifle) is an NFA item.
The suppressor is an NFA item (WHO DOESN’T WANT TO SAVE THEIR HEARING WHILE SHOOTING?)
The SMG (Sub Machine Gun) is an NFA item.
The MG (Machine Gun) is an NFA item. (You ought to look at ALL the things the ATF has listed as MG’s, you’ll get a good laugh out of it).
There are MILLIONS of legally owned NFA items in existence right now. There are hundreds of thousands of Machine Guns in the hands of law abiding American citizens RIGHT NOW that have to ASK PERMISSION from the ATF every time they want to cross state lines with these NFA items. That is and of itself UN AMERICAN :us:!!!
It is high time we do away with this law!!!

49 Likes

I stand behind this! Legal gun owners are not the problem! It is illegal gun owners we need to worry about. Most criminals use guns with serial numbers removed to commit crimes! Most legal gun owners crossing state lines with firearms are not causing problems.

7 Likes

I completely agree, it is completely repugnant to the constitution and shouldn’t exist. The fact that we have to ask permission for a right is disgusting.

8 Likes

Agreed. As a licensed class 3 FFL, I have personally transferred hundreds of firearms through my business. Not one person has been denied due to a background check (That’s right, 100% success rate).

Point being: Only law abiding citizens follow the law, such as following the proper process to purchase firearms. When there are outdated and overhanded laws such as the NFA, they do nothing but punish these responsible, law abiding citizens.

Criminals on the other hand do not come to me to purchase a firearm. Why? It’s because they’re criminals. They don’t care about the law. They will go purchase a “NFA firearm” elsewhere on the street. Or they will make one. They don’t care about the law.

The egregious thing about this is politicians roll out more laws and enforce the NFA even more on law abiding citizens, who have nothing to do with criminal activity regarding firearms. (As a matter of fact, those good people actually do more to stop criminal activity with their firearms, and arguably even more so with effective NFA firearms)

Thus I agree: Law abiding citizens should not be punished for purchasing devices that protect hearing (suppressors) or convenient rifles that happen to have shorter barrels, all of which the NFA punishes. Again, the bad guys, to whom the NFA was intended, disregard the NFA.

:point_right: The NFA has a negligible effect on limiting crime and an immeasurable effect on limiting liberty and self defense for law abiding citizens.

11 Likes

Preamble of The Declaration of Independence (1776)
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms. This right is not granted by the government, but rather is a fundamental, God-given right that is inherent to our humanity. As such, it is only constitutionally protected, not created by the Constitution.

Our rights are unalienable, meaning that they cannot be taken away or surrendered by the individual. The Constitution does not limit the rights of the people, but rather limits the power of the government.

The term “well-regulated” in the 18th century did not refer to government regulation, but rather to the idea of a well-organized, well-armed, and well-disciplined. The militia was composed of all able-bodied males, and the right to keep and bear arms was essential to the security of a free state.

The phrase “shall not be infringed” is an imperative command, not a permissive statement. It means that the government is absolutely prohibited from violating or limiting the right to keep and bear arms.

In conclusion, the Second Amendment clearly guarantees a individual the right to keep and bear arms, and this right is not subject to government regulation or limitation it.

Important dates in the history of gun control laws:

1791: 2A ratified

1934: NFA Passed (imposed tax on the making and transferring of firearms)

1939: NFA updated (with the following act)
[CHAPTER 197]
AN ACT
To provide for the confscation of frearms in possession of persons convicted of felony and disposition thereof.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congres: assembled, That when any person is convicted in any court of the United States of any of the crimes of murder, manslaughter, felonious assault, rape, killing or assaulting a Federal officer, robbery, burglary, bank robbery, killing or kidnaping in committing bank robbery or in avoiding or attempting to avoid apprehension for the commission of bank robbery or in freeing one’s self or attempting to free one’s self from arrest or confinement for bank robbery, transporting or causing to be transported a kidnaped person in interstate or foreion
commerce. transporting or causing to be transported a stolen motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce, Or any felony perpetrated in whole or in part by the use of firearms, Or an attempt to commit any of the foregoing crimes, the court in its judgment of conviction MAY, in addition to the pệnalty or penalties prescribed by law for the punishment of such crime or crimes, order the confiscation and disposal of firearms and ammunition found in the possession or under the immediate control of such person at the time of his arrest. The court may direct the delivery of such frearms or ammunition to the law-enforcement agency which apprehended such person, for its use or for any other disposition in its discretion,
Approved, June 13, 1939,

1968: Gun Control Act (prohibits the sale of firearms and ammunition to felons and certain other prohibited persons)

1972: ATF Created

1986: Hughes Amendment (prohibit the transfer or possession of machine guns)

1994: Brady Bill & AWB (5 day waiting period imposed)

1998: NICS created

2018: Bumpstock Ban

2023: Pistol Brace Rule

They will never stop trying to take your rights.

If you research the actual language of our Founding Documents and define the words at the time of writing, you’d see that all gun control laws are Unconstitutional!

Plus, the 2A was not written just for sport or hunting… Our Forefathers just broke from a tyrannical government and won their freedoms. They knew that the only thing holding back any government was well armed citizens to hold that government accountable.

18 Likes

YES!!!:raised_hands:t2: 100% agree!!!

5 Likes

1 Like

The NFA has long been used as a tool for the ATF to threaten and enslave the rights of law-abiding gun owners. The GOA fully endorsed the “Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today” (SHORT) Act in 2023, and will endorse any other act to repeal the NFA in the future. The 2nd amendment is absolute, and for that reason it is time for the ATF to be dissolved completely. The SCOTUS has ruled in the past that the NFA is within the constitutional rights of Congress to “lay and collect taxes”, but we know that this is more than simple taxation: it is also a backdoor to national gun registry. Bearable arms of all types are included under the Second Amendment.

4 Likes

Absolutely agree we as a nation need to study our founding fathers’ works and restore our nation and its government back to the way it was originally designed to be. Nothing but evil has transpired from bureaucratic control and it’s time to cut off the leaches as they serve no beneficial purpose whatsoever. Enough is enough.

2 Likes

I agree with most of what’s been said here. Repeal the NFA and get back to the way our government was meant to be. The NFA has set a negative precedent that will only grow over time.

Repeal all dea atf

Give the guns to the rightful people, gun laws only pertain to abiding citizens not the real problem, Venezuela gangs for one.