Do away with juries and elected judges . Use AI/
Artificial Intelligence. Parties (whether self represented or pro se or attorneys) submit facts to the case to Artificial Intelligence computer.
They submit their facts and evidentiary files/documents. All participants can lie if they want. But lying or submitting falsified documents and/or testimony is illegal and/or bar ethics charge to the lawyer.
It will do away with biases in class, race, sexual orientation, political, religious affiliation that courts âseeâ. Ycould crank through thousands of cases a day. It would get rid of court back up, delays, infringement of our rights as citizen to speedy trial.
It treats everybody fairly based on evidence and not emotion. But it would do away with it most of the legal community and it will just be like when Uber and lift entered the taxi market of New York.
Everybody hates jury duty. You only get $25 a day so it would completely do away with juries and by your peers? This doesnât happen anymore. Artificial Intelligence would take into consideration a âjury of your peers by simply putting in race, age, etc.
By your peers? For juvenile cases? I never see anybody whoâs their age on a jury.
And I am a part five on the back 9 of 50 does that mean that everyone on my jury needs to be in their mid-50s? Theyâre generally older retirees because everybody else tries to get out of jury duty.
I think eventually we could create an ai model that could handle this. It isnt there yet, BUT we could probably create a non ai program that has every law and existing case law and runs preliminary outcomes against both sides of a current case. This could augment the work of current judges and their clerks, and could help some judges on the 9th circuit who complain Bruen is too complicated. Maybe it could help them realize theyre just being activist tyrants. A digital system like this could also be a form of transparency for the people so we can monitor those activist judges and know when we need to nullify or take part in civilized and peaceful noncompliance to protect our rights.
I believe it CAN be done but lawyers will throw a fit, they charge $150-$650 an HOUR. Sign me up for that. There is NO way theyâll support it. Theyâll hopefully be put out of business.
No, I am not going to trust a single artificial intelligence that someone programmed to take over courtroom procedure. No more than I trust machines to handle the counting of ballots.
I, for one, actually lament the fact that I have never been summed for jury duty.
Instead of AI replacing human jurors, I think it might be best to start out with allowing defendants to âopt inâ to a pre-trial AI hearing that is programatically designed with an LLM (Large Language Model) that includes the framework for strict Constitutional Law. This pre-trial AI hearing may then be administered into evidence during an actual jury trial, serving as additional testimonial evidence for or against the defendant.
Introducing AI into the courtroom in this layered OPT IN pre-trial session approach may lessen public concerns over the introduction of AI-impacting judgements and judicial decisions. It seems only proper to begin the introduction of AI into all branches of our political system at this time. I think society is ready for it â my two cents.
Agreed but fixable. A simple examination of the code and the data would reveal biasâŚnot hard to do. Make the code âopen sourceâ and it would be impossible to secretly install bias â which is probably the natural progression of publicly used AI systems anyway.
Until AI training and coding can be proven to be unbiased and unscewed by their developers this should never occur!
Understanding Jury Duties and Responsibilities
Jury Duty: Your Role in Justice!
Did you know serving on a jury is one of the most important civic duties you can perform? Hereâs what you need to know about your responsibilities:
Participate Actively: As a juror, your role is to listen carefully to the evidence presented and deliberate with fellow jurors. Your decisions can impact lives!
Stay Impartial: Keep an open mind. Avoid biases and preconceived notionsâevery case deserves a fair evaluation based on the facts.
Follow the Law: Jurors must adhere to the law as instructed by the judge. Your job is to apply the law to the facts, not to make the law.
Respect Confidentiality: Discussions about the case should remain private until a verdict is reached. This ensures a fair trial for everyone involved.
Commit to the Process: Jury duty requires your time and attention. Be prepared for the possibility of long hours and the importance of your role in the justice system.
Jury Nullification: This is the right of jurors to acquit a defendant, even if the evidence suggests guilt, if they believe the law is unjust or misapplied. Itâs a powerful tool in the hands of the jury to uphold justice beyond strict legal definitions.
Remember: Jury duty is not just an obligation; itâs an opportunity to contribute to democracy and uphold justice. Embrace your role and make a difference!
No AI with todays technology can provide the human evaluation and humanity needed ! Although it might provide a tools to make courts and the judicial system more effective eventually.
Might make more sense to initially use AI as a trial review to determine if an automatic appeal should be filed. Once vested in that aspect further expansion to a tool for jury use to seek clarification on the law, legal aspects, and elements of proof. Making the jury AI QA available to the prosecution, defense, and judge during the trial and the appeals courts.
Now, unless we can get todayâs Jurors to stop being bias and religiously follow those steps you provided, it really wouldnt matter if the jury was a bias human or bias AI, now would it? ROFLâŚjust kidding.
We are nearly on the same page with a gradual introduction and supporting role for AI in our legal system. Continued perfection and expanded support roles can come laterâŚeventual jury replacement for speedy trials can come MUCH later, if allowed. Sounds like a natural process of slow integration with this sort of disruptive technology.
This leads to a world of open tyranny. He who controls the computers rules the world and thereâs nothing you can do about it except be obedient and hope whoever runs the AI likes you today.
My main concern with this with current ai is hallucinations. Sometimes it just makes stuff up, and creates nonexistent sources and even case law. As far as I know we dont understand how or why it does this.
To me, this topic isnt about ai, its about how we can make the justice system more streamlined, more just, and more transparent, because we are all getting screwed over by the current methodologies.
Ai was one suggestion, but it opened up the floor for more input and awareness.
I asked AI to create a response to this post. Here it is:
This idea is not only deeply flawed but fundamentally misunderstands the justice systemâs purpose and challenges. Hereâs why:
Bias Is Not Erased by AI: AI is built and trained by humans, using human-created data. It inherits biases in that data. Far from eliminating bias, AI can amplify systemic prejudices if not carefully regulated and monitoredâa process thatâs far from foolproof.
Justice Is Not About Speed: The goal of the justice system is fairness, not efficiency. âCranking through thousands of cases a dayâ isnât justice; itâs an assembly line. Complex cases often involve nuanced human judgment, interpretation, and moral considerations that no AI can replicate.
Juries Are Essential to Democracy: Jury trials ensure that ordinary citizensânot just government or algorithmsâhave a say in justice. This is a cornerstone of democratic systems and a protection against tyranny or abuse of power.
Lying and False Evidence: Simply saying lying is illegal doesnât prevent it. Detecting deception often requires cross-examination, body language interpretation, and the subjective but critical insight of human judgmentânone of which AI can handle effectively.
AI in Context: Using AI as a tool to assist judges or lawyers in analyzing evidence could be beneficial. But replacing juries, judges, and the entire legal system with an algorithm undermines accountability, transparency, and humanity in law.
Justice Cannot Be Reduced to Data: People are more than their ârace, age, etc.â Jury trials are about lived experiences, moral reasoning, and societal norms. Reducing âjury of your peersâ to statistical inputs strips away the essence of justice as a human endeavor.
This proposal sacrifices core democratic values and risks grave miscarriages of justice under the guise of efficiency. Instead of replacing the system with AI, we should focus on reforming it to better address biases and inefficiencies while preserving human oversight and compassion.
Although I am not arguing for AI to replace Jurists, mind you, I am only assisting with brainstorming this policy proposal. That said, I now offer non-AI counter-arguments and comments to what you have harvestedâŚ
Bias Is Not Erased by AI : This conclusion is based on the assumption that time is static and algorithms do not evolve over time. Bias can be (and should be) minimized over time with algorithmic and LLM upgrades to AI systems.
Justice Is Not About Speed : Correct, however, the right to a speedy trial cannot be discounted. The option to a speedy trial for a simple traffic violation supplied with AI oversight and defendant-signed agreements should be made available to those who do not wish to drive out of state 3 months later and go address some insignificant violation of a law. To simply hold on to antiquated and inefficient drug-out legal processes in the name of empathy and careful legal reflection of the matter, does not fit MOST legal cases, and ignores the right of the defendant to have a speedy trial for a trivial offense.
Juries Are Essential to Democracy : Muskets and cannonballs were also essential to Democracy at one time also. This argument simply makes the case that things remain as they are, even when everything around it is moving forward.
Lying and False Evidence : To say that, since AI cannot perform critical sensory analysis TODAY to detect when a human is lying, then AI should not be allowed to evolve and be fitted with the proper technology that can measure the probably of human lies by minutia point changes, heat changes, verbal and tonal variations across word streams. This item should not be restricted to a fixed technological capability in time â it should assume advancement.
AI in Context : Using AI as a support role today, and evolving that role with technological advancements is certainly using AI in context. If at a later date, AI is capable of replacing human roles, then the argument here is mute, since it centers around stagnant technology.
Justice Cannot Be Reduced to Data : But justice can be greatly enhanced by data Assuming future AI capabilities in future roles within our legal system is very difficult. Perhaps we can start with a support role and pick this up again in a decade or two?
OK, I think I whooped on this dead-horse long enoughâŚhope that helps.
AI is designed to be anti-human/anti-life programmed by technocrat control freak psychos - garbage in = garbage out. Everyone got along just fine without all these absurd and downright satanic electronic gadgets that did not exist until recently. NOBODY NEEDS THIS AI CRAP!
Humanity everywhere is being assaulted by THE TECHNOCRATIC OMNIWAR! RESIST! DO NOT CONSENT TO ALL THINGS DIGITAL, âSMARTâ, AI, 5G, NO CASH - ALL OF IT! https://dhughes.substack.com/ Technocrat ruling class psychos get a sadistic thrill from their powers over life and death and hurting all who stand in their way and they need the resources worldwide to build their digital total slavery control grids (herd survivors into 15 minute city digital prisons)!
Agreed. In secret, personally, I agree with you 100% and dont want ANY of this tech. around me because I have seen how this elite satanic garbage sociopathic crowd abused the technology and turned it against us. It is not the tech. I fearâŚits the sociopaths that abuse it for their own sick New World Order agenda.
Anway, I am only brainstorming FOR the policy proposal, and could have easily argued AGAINST it as you have done (so dont shoot the messengerâŚrofl).
Side note: I still run CRT box TVs in my house, with no wireless communications, and appliances that have fixed manual (non-digital) controls, so I really get your point and agree (but dont tell anyone!)
Jury Duty: Your Role in Justice! 
Participate Actively: As a juror, your role is to listen carefully to the evidence presented and deliberate with fellow jurors. Your decisions can impact lives!
Stay Impartial: Keep an open mind. Avoid biases and preconceived notionsâevery case deserves a fair evaluation based on the facts.
Follow the Law: Jurors must adhere to the law as instructed by the judge. Your job is to apply the law to the facts, not to make the law.
Respect Confidentiality: Discussions about the case should remain private until a verdict is reached. This ensures a fair trial for everyone involved.
Commit to the Process: Jury duty requires your time and attention. Be prepared for the possibility of long hours and the importance of your role in the justice system.
Jury Nullification: This is the right of jurors to acquit a defendant, even if the evidence suggests guilt, if they believe the law is unjust or misapplied. Itâs a powerful tool in the hands of the jury to uphold justice beyond strict legal definitions.
Remember: Jury duty is not just an obligation; itâs an opportunity to contribute to democracy and uphold justice. Embrace your role and make a difference! 
