Three New Constitutional Amendments needed

A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

1. A Presidential, Line-Item Veto over the Federal Budget

Such a Presidential veto could be over-ridden only by a ¾ vote or more (75+%) in both the House (327/435) and the Senate (75/100); whereas a simple 50% majority was required to pass that fiscal year budget as a whole). This Amendment will empower the President to put some specific limits to Congressional spending in the annual federal budget for each fiscal year, which begins each October 1st.

A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

2. Control of the U.S. Congress.

2A**. Congressional Term limits**. This amendment imposes a limit of 12 years which would be two full elected terms for a U.S. Senator and would be six full elected terms for the U.S. House of Representatives or any combination totaling twelve years elected to Congress. (Partial terms in office due to being appointed or elected to fill a newly vacant, partial term in a Congressional office shall not be included in this 12-year limit.) This amendment will return to the idea of citizen legislators, not career politicians. (For example, 6 House terms or 3 House terms plus one Senate term or 2 Senate terms, would all be within the 12-year maximum limit.) (Contingent on #5 below, the repeal of the 17th Amendment.

2B. This amendment will cut/eliminate Congressional pensions and salaries.

Per diem pay only. Expense account limits.

2C. This amendment will prohibit and penalize insider trading (stock equities). The penalty is impeachment and removal from office plus a term of four years in federal prison. The prohibition and penalty apply to both Congressional members and their family members as well as all Congressional staff members and their family members. The four groups mentioned will have their personal investments held in a ‘blind trust’ during (or sold prior to) their term of service in the Congress.

2D. This amendment will limit Congressional bills to one subject, no ‘earmarks’ can be added.

(But not the national budget.)

2E. Congress members and their staff shall not be exempt from the laws. No separate programs shall be set up for Congress members, their families, nor their staff. “Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply to the Senators and/or Representatives; and the Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply to the citizens of the United States.”

2F. All current Congressional pension funds shall be transferred to the Social Security Fund.

2G. The separate Congressional Healthcare program would be abolished.

2H. No member of a Secret Society may hold federal public office. (There are many such societies, Orders, and clubs, too many. Do you want names and examples? Here are nine: The Freemasons, the Jesuits, the Illuminati, the Carbonari, the Burschenschaften, the Triad, the Yakuza, the Costa Nostra, Yale University’s Skull and Bones Society.)

2I. No dual citizenships for federal office holders. No divided loyalties. (Israel, that means you!)

A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

3. National Election Reform.

3A. “If you can’t vote, then you can’t contribute” to Federal Elections. American elections are to be by and for U.S. citizens only, not merely residents, and not corporate “persons”. (See the US Supreme Court decision in 2010, the Citizens United case.). This proposed Constitutional Amendment will reduce the undue influence from PACs, corporations, labor unions, foreigners, and from out of district and out of state “outsiders” in election campaigns. This Constitutional Amendment would prohibit minors, non-US citizens, foreign governments, their citizens, their governmental agencies, NGOs, as well as any corporation, corporate “legal persons”, LLCs and PACs, from donating or reimbursing money, labor, material, goods, time, support and any other in-kind contribution to federal elections and campaigns for federal office and punishes said donations and contributions. Election campaign donations and other “gifts” by corporate lobbyists will be considered to be bribery and punished by law.

3B. To prohibit bundling donations and transferring money collected for one candidate or election campaign to another candidate or election campaign. No ‘middlemen’. Each donor is to be identified with a name, a signature, their legally registered address (as in their county voter registration) and their current occupation(s). Services for the election campaign are to be paid upon delivery. (Hence, no company donations and no campaign debts.) “Unused” donations to be transferred to the U.S. Treasury. No bonuses for staff workers. No transfers to future election campaigns. No transfers as personal wealth. No political ‘slush’ funds.

2 Likes

While Constitutional Amendments can be accomplished by Congress; it would not likely happen. You may want to check out the thread on Convention of States: Call a Convention of the States to Limit the Scope, Power and Jurisdiction of the Federal Government - #441 by czingle

3 Likes

A Convention of States sounds good but cannot be limited to one subject.
Wasn’t the Constitution adopted and the Articles of Confederation replaced in a Convention of States?

The Articles of Confederation were replaced during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The Convention of States aims to propose several amendments. If you’re interested, I recommend reading “The Liberty Amendments” by Mark Levin.

1 Like

And this is why I can never vote for a constitutional convention. I believe in the first amendment that includes the right to assemble. I was a job’s daughter my grandmother and aunt were Eastern Stars my grandfather was a Freemason, none of those people were bad people nor did they do bad things or anything you see on TV in fact primarily what they did was held bizarre’s and raised funds for veterans. So how long will it be before regular church services canceled because you don’t want any secret organizations. I wonder if my stepmother who was a nursing instructor for years I wonder if her sorority sisters and her would agree with your no secret clubs.

The constitutional Amendment that we actually need would be one that would rain in the commerce clause I’m not sure that we actually need that one we may just need a good court case taken to the Supreme Court where the Supreme Court looks at and says you know the commerce club clause is for border to border not within your state borders. Messing with the Constitution is dangerous it is a double-edged sword and it swings both ways

1 Like

No secret club memberships for government officers, elected or appointed.
I do not wonder if George Bush of Yale University and Skull and Bones Society would agree.
Secret college sororities included.

How about a penalty for violating the Constitution or a citizen’s rights?

2 Likes

Yes, Larry a convention can be limited to a single subject or a fixed set of subjects. That has been upheld in two rulings long ago by the federal courts. The Articles of Confederation were replaced when the states ratified the Constitution in 1788.

Carrie, To fix the Commerce Clause will require a convention under Article V which is constitutional, but that does not make it a constitutional convention. Article V limits a convention to “proposing amendments…as part of this Constitution.” The Convention of States application being used by the state legislatures limits a convention it triggers to 3 subject areas only, and none of those subjects would permit this convention to diminish any individual liberties or take any power from the states. It directs all amendment at the federal government, and every amendment would be required to limit, restrain or remove power from the federal government. The Supreme Court changes direction from liberal to conservative based on appointments now made by partisans and since they do not apply law to the Constitution anymore on the liberal side of things, we need an amendment that will be more permanent. It is after all the Court that altered the Commerce Clause in the 1930s and 40s that is the root of this particular problem. There is no double edged sword since it takes 2/3 of the states to call a convention, 3/4 of the states to ratify anything that comes our of the convention, the convention merely proposes amendments but cannot enact them and the subject matter is pre-set and limited by the states in the application they pass before any convention is called.

Thank you for that explanation but honestly I still do not trust any politician to make this happen.

2 Likes

Legal residents can’t vote now

4th: Senator Rand Paul’s Balanced Budget Amendment :100: