The Video-Evidenced Accountability Act of 2025

Liberty
1

The Video-Evidenced Criminal Accountability Act is designed to mandate guilty pleas when crimes are captured on video, thereby streamlining justice and protecting victims from prolonged litigation.

:classical_building: The Video-Evidenced Criminal Accountability Act of 2025

Section 1. Title

This Act shall be cited as the Video-Evidenced Criminal Accountability Act of 2025.

Section 2. Purpose

To establish a mandatory guilty plea requirement for criminal defendants whose unlawful conduct is clearly and conclusively captured on video, thereby reducing judicial backlog, protecting victims, and reinforcing the integrity of visual evidence in criminal proceedings.

Section 3. Findings

Congress finds that:

  • Video evidence has become a primary and reliable form of documentation in criminal investigations, often providing irrefutable proof of unlawful conduct.

  • Prolonged litigation in cases with clear video evidence burdens the court system, retraumatizes victims, and undermines public confidence in justice.

  • Defendants who are visually identified committing crimes should not be permitted to delay justice through procedural gamesmanship or frivolous defenses.

Section 4. Definitions

For this Act:

  • Video-Evidenced Crime means any criminal act captured on video in which the perpetrator is visually and conclusively identifiable.

  • Conclusive Identification means the perpetrator’s identity is confirmed through facial recognition, biometric match, or corroborated by law enforcement and witness testimony.

  • Mandatory Plea Requirement means the legal obligation of the defendant to enter a guilty plea upon verification of video evidence.

Section 5. Mandatory Guilty Plea Requirement

(a) In any criminal proceeding where:

  • The alleged offense is captured on video, and

  • The defendant is conclusively identified as the perpetrator,

The defendant shall be required to enter a guilty plea within 30 days of arraignment.

(b) Failure to enter a guilty plea shall result in:

  • Immediate waiver of trial rights.

  • Automatic entry of a guilty verdict by the court.

  • Sentencing to proceed without further evidentiary hearing.

(c) The court shall retain discretion to consider mitigating factors during sentencing, but shall not permit plea withdrawal or trial motions once video evidence is authenticated.

Section 6. Authentication of Video Evidence

(a) Video evidence must be authenticated by:

  • Law enforcement certification.

  • Chain-of-custody documentation.

  • Expert verification of integrity and identity.

(b) Defendants may challenge the authenticity of the video only within the first 15 days of arraignment. Challenges beyond this period shall be deemed waived.

Section 7. Exceptions

This Act shall not apply in cases where:

  • The video is incomplete, obscured, or lacks conclusive identification.

  • The defendant presents credible evidence of coercion, duress, or mistaken identity.

  • The crime involves classified or national security-sensitive material.

Section 8. Enforcement and Oversight

(a) The Department of Justice shall oversee implementation and guide state and federal courts.

(b) A national registry of video-evidenced convictions shall be maintained to track compliance and outcomes.

This proposed legislation is a common-sense response to the abuses that liberal policies have inflicted upon the psyche of the American people.

2

Where do I even begin with how asinine this idea is?

You want to want to dismiss with the Constitutional right to trial by jury if you can claim you have a criminal on video - in particular at a point when it’s becoming increasingly easy to fake said video - you want to give a person only 15 days to dispute said video,

and then your response to the very obvious question of “Well what if the accused doesn’t want to entry a guilty plea?” is to add on “Your decision to enter a guilty plea or not is irrelevant we’ll just declare you guilty anyway”?

Again, where do I even begin with how asinine this is?

3

If you catch someone “red-handed” and “knee deep” in committing a crime, and you ask them, “Did you do it?” A criminal would say, “No.” That is a lie. Why would anyone, in their right mind, believe a criminal, caught in the act, when he says, “I didn’t do it?” The criminal has blood on his hands. Do you believe him? I am not a gullible fool, are you? I will not give the advantage to the criminal, will you? Do you believe your own eyes? Or do you believe the lie? We have the crime and the criminal on video. We must make the criminal take responsibility for his crime. We don’t owe the criminal the theatrics of a trial. We owe the victim quick justice. The criminal knows what he did. We know he did it. We have it on tape. We do not have to dance to the tune that the criminals sing. They have to take responsibility for their criminal actions. And bleeding hearts like you need to get in line. The children are no longer in charge. So pull up your big boy pants and do the right thing. Hold the criminal accountable…