The Self-Defense Legal Protection Act

Preamble:

Recognizing the fundamental right of individuals to protect themselves, their families, and others from harm, and acknowledging that the criminal justice system serves to determine the legality of such actions under the law, this proposal seeks to rectify a significant imbalance where individuals acquitted of criminal charges in self-defense cases are subsequently subjected to civil litigation. This proposal aims to protect individuals from financial ruin and undue legal harassment following a criminal acquittal on self-defense grounds, using the case of Daniel Penny as a prime example.

Background:

  • Daniel Penny Case: In a noted case, Daniel Penny was acquitted in a criminal court for the use of force in self-defense and defense of others. However, despite his criminal acquittal, he faced civil lawsuits from the family of the individual he defended against, seeking financial compensation. This scenario illustrates a legal loophole that allows civil actions to undermine the finality and fairness of criminal court decisions in self-defense cases.

Proposal:

Section 1: Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to ensure that individuals legally acquitted of criminal charges due to self-defense are not subjected to civil liability for the same act.

Section 2: Scope

  • This Act applies exclusively to individual citizens and does not extend to corporations or legal entities.

  • The legislation will cover cases where self-defense has been legally established in criminal court, resulting in an acquittal or dismissal of charges.

Section 3: Provisions

  • Civil Immunity Post-Acquittal: Upon acquittal or dismissal in a criminal case where self-defense was the basis of the defense, the acquitted individual shall be immune from civil lawsuits concerning the same incident. This immunity extends to claims of wrongful death, assault, battery, or any tort related to the defense action.

  • Preclusion of Civil Action: No civil action may be initiated or maintained against an individual for acts or omissions that have been the subject of a criminal trial where self-defense was upheld or affirmed by the court.

Section 4: Implementation

  • Court Notification: Upon acquittal, the court shall issue a certificate of immunity for self-defense, which serves as a legal document to be used in dismissing any subsequent civil claims.

  • Legal Recourse for Abuse: Civil courts retain the authority to dismiss actions with prejudice against parties who attempt to sue in violation of this Act, potentially awarding legal fees to the defendant.

Section 5: Enforcement

  • This Act shall be enforced by all state and federal courts. Judges are required to recognize and uphold this immunity when presented with civil claims that contravene this law.

Section 6: Effective Date

This Act shall take effect one year after its passage to allow for public education and legal adjustments.

Conclusion:

The “Self-Defense Legal Protection Act” aims to ensure that individuals who act within the bounds of the law to protect themselves or others are not unduly punished through the civil legal system. By using the Daniel Penny case as an example, this legislation underscores the need to align civil and criminal legal outcomes in cases of self-defense, thereby promoting justice and fairness while preventing the financial exploitation of legal self defense actions.

1 Like

This is a great start. @Broperatortime

However in some states the initial investigation determines this is a justified self defense and therefore no charges are pressed and no prosecution takes place in recognition of no crime. Your policy should cover this category of justified self defense without Prosecution as well.

2 Likes