The Organic Growth, Regenerative Farming, and Food Freedom Act

[Carmenstarot]

I propose that the following 2 policy proposals, about regenerative farming get merged:

1

Written by @FarmerJohn

Food for the People

Policy solutions to protect farmers and consumers from overbearing government and corporate restrictions on what they can eat, and how that food is made. Redesigning America’s nutritional guidelines away from highly-processed, corporatized food, towards natural, clean food, while protecting the freedom to choose. For decades, small and mid-sized family farms have disappeared from the rural American landscape and economy, replaced by ever larger farms and food processors that consolidate food pr…

2

Written by @Carmenstarot

The Organic Growth and Farmer Incentive Act

The Organic Growth and Farmer Incentive Act Purpose: This policy aims to provide substantial financial incentives and support to encourage organic farming, reduce reliance on genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and ensure that the agriculture industry thrives with sustainable, healthy food production. The goal is to make farming a lucrative and desirable profession while promoting organic practices that benefit both the environment and public health. Key Objectives: Boost Organic Farming:…

Explanation & Justification

The proposed merge aims to consolidate efforts to protect and support small and organic farmers while restructuring America’s agricultural policies to prioritize health, sustainability, and economic fairness. Both proposals align closely in their focus on creating a more equitable agricultural landscape and promoting organic, regenerative farming methods as an alternative to harmful, large-scale industrial farming practices.

Why the Proposals Should Be Merged

1. Aligned Objectives:

• Both proposals share a common goal: to reform agricultural policy in a way that supports small and mid-sized farms, incentivizes organic and sustainable practices, and reduces the influence of large corporate players that currently dominate the market. By merging, the combined proposal can present a unified front that showcases the need for comprehensive and consistent policies.

2. Enhanced Policy Impact:

• Merging the proposals will create a more robust and detailed policy framework that addresses the multifaceted challenges faced by small farmers and consumers. By combining the insights from the organic farmer incentive policies with the broader policy solutions outlined in the current proposal, the merged document can offer a complete vision for transforming the agricultural landscape.

3. Streamlined Legislative Action:

• The complexity of agricultural legislation, particularly the Farm Bill, requires a well-coordinated approach to achieve meaningful reform. By merging the proposals, policymakers can engage with a single, cohesive document that presents a clear and comprehensive strategy, making it easier to garner support and push for legislative action. It avoids fragmentation and ensures that the voices of small and organic farmers are united in the call for change.

4. Comprehensive Solutions for Farmers and Consumers:

• The merged proposal would provide a detailed, actionable set of policies that cover all aspects of agricultural reform: from reducing regulatory burdens on small farms and incentivizing organic practices, to revising nutritional guidelines and improving food quality and accessibility for consumers. By presenting these interconnected solutions in a single proposal, the policy becomes more comprehensive, addressing the full spectrum of issues from farm to table.

5. Stronger Advocacy and Public Support:

• A unified proposal that addresses both the specific needs of organic farmers and the broader challenges in the agricultural sector will resonate more effectively with the public and advocacy groups. It allows for a more powerful campaign to build support and mobilize action, as the policies are presented as a cohesive and holistic approach rather than separate and potentially competing initiatives.

Conclusion

Merging these proposals creates an opportunity to strengthen the overall policy framework and increase its effectiveness in driving change. By aligning the incentives for organic farmers with broader agricultural reform, the merged proposal ensures that all stakeholders—small farmers, consumers, and policymakers—are represented in the push for a more sustainable, healthy, and fair agricultural system. It is a strategic move that amplifies the impact of both contributions, streamlining the path toward meaningful legislative reform.

[mrpil (Marian Pilecki)]

FINDING COMMON GROUND - The HighWire
This is a great episode on regenerative agriculture, farmers actually save money. If our soil is stripped of nutrients then our food has no nutrients. Regenerative and organic should be the norm. Money saved on chemicals, no cost to certify organic and non GMO, incentives to farm using regenerative techniques, natural pest control will increase the ability of farmers to provide healthy food and reduce the cost of healthy food sources for consumers. Provide support and education to farmers to convert to natural methods. Roundup, herbicides, pesticides should be banned, on our food, it will also prevent it from contaminating our water. Also no antibiotics, hormones, vaccines in our meat supply. Organic feed, and grassfed. Look to the amish population to see how they do.

[PatriotV (Patriot)]

Hi

[Carmenstarot]

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on regenerative agriculture, Marian. I completely agree that adopting organic and regenerative practices can not only save farmers money but also improve the health of our soil and food. It’s inspiring to think about the possibilities if more farmers had access to the resources and support needed to transition to these methods. Banning harmful chemicals like pesticides and herbicides would protect not just our food supply but also our water sources and ecosystem as a whole. Supporting and educating farmers on sustainable practices is crucial for creating a healthier and more resilient food system. We need to prioritize incentives and policies that make organic, pesticide-free, and hormone-free food the standard. The Amish example is an excellent reminder of how natural methods can benefit communities and should be a model for us all.

[Carmenstarot]

Hello