Congress needs to pass legislation that criminalizes any public discussion about the muslim culture, the muslim hadiths, or the mulsim sharia law. Specifically, Congress needs to ban any mention of how the muslim culture allows grown men to marry children. The American people can not know this about the muslims. We would have to pass laws making molesting children legal, as it is under sharia law.
Additionally, Congress needs to forbid any mention of the muslim culture and its relationship to women. Congress needs to suppress how the muslim culture denigrates women and treats them like second-class people. Congress can never allow the American people to know that it’s legal, in the islamic culture, to kill women for committing adultery. If we adopt the muslim culture, we will have to kill our adulterous spouses rather than sue the adulterer and get half of their wealth in the divorce settlement. Congress can never allow the American people to know that the muslim culture will kill them if they leave it. Or, kill them if they mock alla like we mock Jesus. There can never be a time when the truth of sharia and the cultural practices of the muslims can be revealed to the American people before assimilation. Why? Because no one in their right mind would live under the cultural conditions that the muslims live under if they were not threatened with death. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the Congress of the United States of America to do everything in its power to conceal, from the American people, the things that the muslims do so that the American people will consent to sharia law and the jettisoning of Constitutional law.
The above discussion argues that Congress should enact laws to restrict public discourse on Muslim culture, Hadiths, and Sharia law. It suggests banning discussions about controversial topics such as child marriage, women’s rights, and religious apostasy within Islamic culture. The text implies that revealing these aspects to the American public could prevent the adoption of Sharia law. It emphasizes the importance of keeping certain cultural practices hidden to ensure acceptance and integration, arguing that awareness of these issues might lead to resistance against such cultural norms.
Therefore, Congress must ban and censor information that would clarify, for the American people, the risks associated with giving up our Constitution and adopting sharia law.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/
The reality on the ground has long suppressed open criticism of Islam in mainstream media. How often have you come across posts online that critically discuss sharia law? How frequently have you seen videos showing how sharia law is enforced in countries like Saudi Arabia or Iran? Where have you read that the American public largely opposes the implementation of sharia law in the United States? When have you heard American leaders unequivocally assert that “the Constitution is the supreme law of the land” and that sharia law is incompatible with American values?
Why are Congress and the governors of all fifty states ignoring the growing establishment of parallel legal systems, such as sharia courts, within the country? Why are officials allowing this to happen without scrutiny? You’ve likely rarely, if ever, heard discussions about sharia law on mainstream media. During the Obama administration, terms like “radical Islamic terrorism” were removed from official government language by figures such as Obama and then-FBI Director Robert Mueller. Why was this done? To obscure the realities of what some extremist factions within the Muslim community may be pursuing.
Rather than perpetuating the narrative that Muslims are universally peaceful assimilationists, it would be more honest for the government to confront the issue directly. Ignoring it only fosters confusion and mistrust. It’s time for transparent, open dialogue about the implications of sharia law and its potential impact on the foundational principles of the United States.
Basically, he keeps posting the same basic proposal - a proposal that looks pro-Islam on the surface but is actually sarcastic - because he insists that spamming these proposals here is somehow the key to saving America from Islam.
Below the surface and on the surface, you know that this post is clearly NOT pro-islam. If we are to save America from islam, we must, first, save islam from sharia.
Not our circus not our monkeys, stay out of other countries problems and let them figure it out themselves. We as a country need to stop budding our fat heads into every conflict. It’s not our business, Shira law should be 100% banned in our country and that’s all.
People may laugh at this and quote the first amendment. When I read this it appeared to me to be somebody being provocative to start a discussion. Sadly this is currently the reality in Britain and if you speak out Government Brown shirts will kick in your door and arrest you. The fascists currently running the UK are about to pass a law that says exactly what Dr Who suggests. One man spoke out bringing to public view the rape of 20,000 children. he was jailed and still rots in prison. His crime the courts wanted to keep the rapes secret and he published a documentary. In Britain you are not allowed to protect children against rape gangs. USA needs to wake up or it will happen. 5 years ago you would have said no president will ever support an invasion of the country by 10,000,000 people and at least 3,000,000 unvetted fighting aged men. It happened.
He’s making a proposal that even he doesn’t want taken seriously, and it’s pretty clear that his attempts at sarcasm have failed since the core reactions he’s getting are exactly the kind of reactions he wants, people objecting to what sparked the proposal in the first place.
On top of that, he felt it necessary to make multiple versions of this sarcastic proposal, which is only shooting himself in the foot.
It would be nice to hear you say that sharia law is barbaric for the following reasons: It makes it legal to off your child, your wife, your Christian neighbor, your Jewish neighbor, your gay son or daughter, your blasphemous kinfolk, your dog, your pig, your soccer-playing child…shall I continue? The issue is not Dr. Who. The issue is do you want everyone in the world to act like the muslims do?
All Americans must be made aware of the anti-American cultures in our country. Islam is not only anti-American, it is anti-semetic and anti-Christian. It is an anti-Christ culture. To be knowledgeable about such things is to be warned about them. Knowledgeable is power against the enemy. Islam and Sharia law are enemies.
Yes I agree but in the UK there are now sharia courts and the government is passing laws preventing the criticism of Islam. His post should be seen as a wake up call. Why are leftists in all western democracies flooding their countries with Islamic terrorists. It is coordinated and is not an accident.
In case you haven’t noticed…this is the United States Of America and FREEDOM OF SPEACH is our most protected right under God. No to your censorship ideology. If you do not like what our constitutional laws are find another country to impose your positions on please just leave us alone. We should treat you with respect and muslems should obey our laws. If our laws don’t meet your needs or belief system go somewhere else. We can be friends but when you are in my house you respect my rules.
You do realize you’re contradicting yourself. Yes, we are one nation under God.
So why would we allow our nation to be infiltrated by Muslims? Muslims are not under God. They are under Allah.
“…So why would we allow our nation to be infiltrated by Muslims?”
I believe that, as a nation, we should not support allowing individuals into our country who harbor hostility toward us or have no intention of embracing our values and customs. “We, the people,” do not want people to come to our country who want to unalive us. Or, destroy our economy. The American people understand that “ideology” MATTERS. If your ideology teaches you to destroy America and/or replace capitalism with communism or any other ism, “we the people” regard this as a hostile ideology. This is a matter of self-preservation. And if you adhere to a hostile ideology, that, by definition, disqualifies you from entering our country, engaging in our culture, or participating in our economy. Why? Because we can not go to any country, on Earth, and practice our Constitutional rights while we are there. We MUST conform to the customs of the locals in that country. If this approach is good for everyone else in the world, why is this approach not good for the American people? Why can’t we insist on the respect that comes from mutual reciprocity? Our politicians and industrialists seem to be following Albert Pike’s plan for provoking the third World War, using Muslims to initiate a Jihad against America as the trigger. They want America gone. Without a trace. So, as I see it, our politicians are the problem. Our politicians are allowing our nation to be, “infiltrated by muslims.”
Oh heck no! Keep Sharia law out of America. We have our own laws and we don’t need other cultures inflicting their beliefs on ours. THIS IS AMERICA you want to marry babies and have sex with them go back to your own country. I’m sick of other cultures coming in and changing who we are! We are NOT your whipping posts. GO HOME
