We need to prohibit the U.S. government and media from using propaganda to influence the American people. A new legal framework or a modification of existing laws would be required, as the current legal landscape allows some level of government-produced content to be accessible to U.S. citizens. Here are a few steps that could be taken to strengthen protections against domestic propaganda:
- Amend the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act:
The most direct approach would be to revisit the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act (2012). Specifically, Congress could amend the law to reinstate or further strengthen the prohibition on domestic dissemination of U.S. government-funded foreign messaging. This would mean explicitly banning government-produced materials (like media content or official statements) from being accessible to U.S. citizens, or making it illegal for federal agencies to distribute propaganda targeting Americans.
- Define “Propaganda” Legally:
There could be a clear legal definition of what constitutes “propaganda” and what distinguishes it from legitimate information or public diplomacy. This could help prevent government agencies from engaging in activities that blur the line between informing the public and attempting to manipulate or influence public opinion for political purposes.
- Limit Government Influence on Media:
Laws could be passed to limit government influence over private media, preventing direct funding or subsidies to media outlets with the intent of shaping domestic public opinion. While the government has historically used public broadcasting services (like PBS or NPR), additional safeguards could be introduced to ensure these entities operate independently and transparently.
- Enforce Transparency in Government Communications:
For government messaging aimed at the public, greater transparency and oversight could be established. For instance, any content produced or funded by the government for domestic audiences could be required to disclose its origins clearly, and any government entity attempting to sway public opinion would have to provide evidence-based justifications for its communications.
-
Strengthen the Role of the Media in Holding Government Accountable:
A free and independent press plays a crucial role in keeping government activities in check. Strengthening protections for journalistic independence, limiting conflicts of interest, and ensuring that the media can operate without government interference would be key in counteracting any form of state-driven propaganda. This would also involve reinforcing laws that protect whistleblowers, journalists, and free expression.
-
Independent Oversight Bodies:
An independent oversight body could be established to review and monitor any government attempts to influence public opinion. This body could be tasked with ensuring that government communications adhere to ethical standards and do not cross into propaganda, providing transparency and accountability.
- Public Education and Media Literacy:
While not strictly a legislative action, increasing public education on media literacy and the recognition of propaganda techniques can help citizens critically assess information they receive, whether from the government or media outlets. Public campaigns or school programs could be introduced to teach citizens how to recognize and resist manipulative content.
By taking these steps, Congress and other policymakers could create a more robust framework that limits the potential for domestic government-sponsored propaganda, ensuring that information aimed at the public is fair, transparent, and ethical.