Since section 230 provides protection for third-party comments Once a company decides to edit or They commit to deciding what content is true or false they should immediately lose their 230 protections. Since the company is deciding what the content must be, then they are approving of the content they are leaving rendering the opposing views, null and void. So the company is no longer using the 230 protection to reduce their own liability. They are using it to remove Peoples freedom of speech.
Solution: allow the company a “Bank of credits”so when they sensor a person that person can immediately challenge it within 10 days and have it adjudicated, and if the company is found to be censoring, they lose one of their credits. Once their credits are diminished and are gone they lose their 230 protection.