The United States Patent and Trademark Office is holding tons of patents/inventions hidden from the public and are secretizing hundreds of solutions to energy. While the rich make more money and gain more power we’re subjugated to using technology made and barely improved upon in the last century.
The FBI, DOD, and EPA are all complicit in suppressing amazing inventions and innovators.
We could literally have high mileage vehicles at the very least to put the American car corporations and American jobs at the forefront of strengthening our economy.
Zero point energy helping us push GDP and means of production to empower our nation to a new age.
(a well done video encompassing this topic and some inventions)
I am confused by your post. Are you suggesting doing any with patents that have energy saving ideas?? Are you saying these patents should become public knowledge and anyone should be able to copy the technology??
The video, all true, purports that 10s of thousands of technologies have been kept from us. release them and we are free of the stranglehold these huge corporations have, THEY WANT TO KEEP RAKING IN OUR MONEY AND RELISH IN THE POWER THEY HAVE OVER US.
While I agree with the premise of your point, there are many individuals holding patents as well. At what point does one have a right, an honor of making their idea profitable for themselves? It is a thin line that we would be walking between ‘who we think’ should be allowed to hold a patent, and who should not. Then in what categories? This is a slippery slippery slope of who ‘gets to profit from their idea’ and who does not. It is the idea of most all that have ‘invented’, that they have created in order to make someone’s life easier in some way.
Patents do expire. Maybe a process should be established, especially with energy and the betterment of civilization as a whole; however, that is a loop in my opinion back to the inventor and their reasonings.
WERE patents designed to protect the ‘greater good’ as you say??? I don’t believe that is why patents began. It is my understanding they began to stop theft of ideas.
And like I said earlier, I understand the premise of this suggestion.
However, I do believe an individual is allowed to profit from their design.
I do not believe in the ‘State’ seizing patents as I have listened to several left wing persona speak of, including Kamala Harris.
I appreciate your perspective and completely agree that the original intent of patents was to protect inventors from having their ideas stolen, thereby allowing them to profit from their creativity and hard work. That protection is essential in a free market, as it ensures individuals have the incentive to innovate without fear of immediate exploitation by others.
However, my concern isn’t with the fundamental idea of patents or the right of individuals to benefit from their inventions. Instead, it’s about how the current patent system can sometimes be manipulated in ways that distort free-market principles. In many instances, large corporations or so-called “patent trolls” accumulate patents not to innovate, but to create barriers to entry for competitors, effectively stifling competition. This misuse of the system can lead to monopolistic practices that limit consumer choices and prevent truly innovative ideas from reaching the market.
This is problematic because it allows for the consolidation of power in the hands of a few entities that leverage the system for their gain, rather than promoting a healthy competitive market. This is not about advocating for state seizure of patents or any form of government overreach, but rather for exposing and addressing abuses that hinder the principles of a free and competitive market.
At the end of the day, a patent system that serves its original purpose—protecting individual inventors without being exploited for monopolistic gains—would align with ideals of individual freedom, market competition, and limited government intervention. Ensuring that the system functions as intended would benefit not only inventors but also the public by fostering a climate where innovation can thrive.
