From fish (farm raised) to chicken (inhumane conditions and feeding) to beef & lamb (fed grains hormones & mRNA poisons) — all of it and more is done to make a profit. The consumer does not know where their food comes from or what cares or lack of care was taken in bringing this meat to market. Whether KFC or Outback Steakhouse or a high end steakhouse — all of it should have some basic requirements in the way it was raised so that the health of the animal is paramount to profit — so the consumer doesn’t have to wonder or avoid the low cost sources like fast food. We need to raise the bar with regulations and enforcement. Not to mention the meat processing plants that source McDonalds type places with rumors of human meat or horse meat mixed into their processing — then fed to humans with artificial flavors to represent beef. The trickery must be severely punished and somehow hold these people accountable.
We need food free from all these chemicals.
You might wish to add two words on the end of your policy proposal title, to include “and medicines”.
Some think that medicines are not poisons, and vice versa. If we buy a chicken, it should only contain chicken…not chicken + spike proteins, prions, medicines, chemicals, molecules, particles, toxins, and particulants that normally don’t exist inside of a chicken, within its natural setting. If the chicken isn’t 100% chicken, then it should be considered “contaminated” and thrown out, no matter WHAT is inside it (even sugar plums and happy dreams). If one buys a chicken, then they should get a chcken. If the buyer does not give his/her express consent to include sugar plums (or mRNA garbage) within a chicken, it should be illegal to sell that chicken to the buyer. There is no such thing as “FDA-allowed percentages” of “express consent”. One could argue that such info is (cryptically) noted on the back of the tiny ingredients label), yet if 95% of the buyers who bought the chicken didn’t know that (for example) ingredient #42: BSA421-MortisFlewsis was code word for “Injected Dead Flies – (or worse yet, chicken-infused mRNA spike proteins and prions)”, then one can hardly argue that these buyers gave their implied consent to eat dead flies (or spike proteins) because the cryptic newly-invented identification was printed in microscopic text on the label. It doesn’t pass the smell test, does it? If even 50% of the buyers knew it, that would be arguable – but not if 95% didn’t know, then something else is afoot. And it simply means that we have discovered intentional efforts to ‘false adverstise’ and hide the information from the customer.
I believe this could be handled by enforcing the current laws regarding vaccinations. You cannot force it on people without their informed consent. If they’re putting this crap in the foods and spraying poisonous pesticides, it has to be noted with all possible side effects ON the package in order to be sold to the population (including the military). Same could be said for the GMO crap.