Breed restrictions in housing policies unfairly target specific breeds, such as Pitbulls, German shepherds, Rottweilers, and Dobermans, based on stereotypes rather than facts. These policies fail to consider that a dog’s behavior is shaped by its upbringing, environment, and individual temperament—not its breed. Leading organizations, including the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), have emphasized that breed alone is not a reliable predictor of a dog’s behavior or safety risk.
Pitbulls, for instance, are known for their affectionate and loyal nature when raised in nurturing environments, often serving as therapy and service animals. Similarly, other so-called “restricted breeds” are unfairly maligned despite being loving and well-behaved family pets in countless households. These restrictions force responsible pet owners to make heartbreaking decisions, exclude families from housing opportunities, and perpetuate harmful misconceptions.
Instead of banning breeds, housing policies should adopt practical, evidence-based solutions such as requiring proof of vaccination, spaying or neutering, and obedience training. These approaches hold all pet owners accountable while ensuring public safety without discriminating against specific breeds.
By removing breed restrictions, we can create more inclusive communities, support responsible ownership, and give all dogs—regardless of their breed—a fair chance to thrive. It’s time to move past outdated policies and focus on what truly matters: the individual character and behavior of each pet.