Purpose:
To update the federal minimum wage to reflect present-day economic realities, tie future adjustments to real cost of living metrics, and ensure all working Americans earn a wage that supports a basic standard of living.
Section 1: Short Title
This Act may be cited as the “Real Living Wage Act of 2025.”
Section 2: Immediate Adjustment of Federal Minimum Wage
a. New Federal Minimum Wage Standard
Effective January 1, 2026, the federal minimum wage shall be set to $17.50 per hour, reflecting inflation-adjusted purchasing power based on the cost of living in 2024 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Expenditure Survey.
b. Exceptions
The minimum wage for tipped employees shall be no less than 70% of the standard minimum wage, phased in over three years.
Employers with fewer than 5 full-time employees may apply for a temporary exemption (1 year maximum), subject to application and review.
Section 3: Annual Adjustment Mechanism
a. Cost-of-Living Indexation
Starting January 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, the minimum wage shall increase automatically based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).
b. Wage Floor Guarantee
The minimum wage shall not decrease during periods of deflation; it may only remain unchanged or increase.
c. Adjustment Cap
Annual increases shall be capped at 5% per year to ensure predictability for employers while protecting wage earners.
Section 4: Commission on Living Wages
a. Creation of the Commission
A new Federal Commission on Living Wages shall be established within the Department of Labor.
b. Duties
Annually review whether the current wage adequately covers essential costs: housing, food, transportation, healthcare, and child care.
Provide recommendations to Congress on regional wage adjustments where needed.
Section 5: Enforcement & Compliance
a. Enforcement Authority
The Department of Labor shall enforce compliance, investigate complaints, and apply penalties for noncompliance.
b. Penalties
Employers found in violation may be subject to:
Fines up to $10,000 per violation.
Mandatory back pay to affected workers with interest.
Section 6: Severability
If any provision of this Act is found to be unconstitutional or invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected.
1. Empirical Evidence Shows Modest Increases Don’t Cause Large Job Losses
Studies and meta-analyses, including those by the Congressional Budget Office and economists like Arindrajit Dube, consistently show that moderate increases in the minimum wage have little to no significant effect on overall employment.
Many regions and cities (e.g., Seattle, New York) that raised minimum wages saw stable or rising employment in low-wage sectors like hospitality and retail.
2. “Real Minimum Wage is $0” Is a Misleading Oversimplification
This phrase is rhetorical, not analytical. While it’s true that unemployed people earn nothing, the implication that raising wages directly causes unemployment overlooks the complexity of labor markets.
Unemployment is influenced by multiple factors: automation, economic cycles, regional demand, corporate consolidation—not just wage floors.
3. Higher Minimum Wages Can Increase Job Stability and Productivity
Paying workers more often reduces turnover, increases worker effort, and leads to greater job stability—all of which improve productivity and reduce hiring/training costs.
Businesses benefit from a more reliable, experienced workforce, especially in service industries where customer satisfaction matters.
4. Demand-Side Economics: Workers Are Also Consumers
Low-wage workers are more likely to spend their earnings, fueling local economies. Raising the minimum wage can stimulate demand, which may actually increase employment in many sectors.
Henry Ford’s old insight remains relevant: paying workers enough to buy what they produce supports broader economic growth.
5. Real-World Examples Contradict the Claim
Countries with higher minimum wages than the U.S. (e.g., Australia, Germany) do not have higher unemployment rates.
This suggests that well-calibrated wage floors do not inherently destroy jobs and may, in fact, coexist with strong labor markets.
Conclusion
The claim that higher minimum wages necessarily lead to joblessness and “real wages of $0” is not supported by economic consensus or evidence. A nuanced view shows that moderate increases in the minimum wage tend to benefit workers and communities without significantly harming employment.
Economic Policy Institute: living wage laws in cities like Baltimore, Boston, L.A., and SF raised productivity, earnings, and lowered turnover upward-mobility.urban.org+3epi.org+3nber.org+3.
Brenner & Luce (2005): Boston’s ordinance resulted in better jobs, reduced debt, ability to take classes/vacations, and shorter work weeks upward-mobility.urban.org+1jacksonville.gov+1.
Neumark & Adams (NBER): living wage laws boosted low-wage earnings and reduced urban poverty rates—especially when designed as “business assistance” ordinances epi.org+3nber.org+3en.wikipedia.org+3.
4. Positive business & municipal outcomes
Cambridge Shift Project: 93% of living wage-accredited firms reported benefits—reduced training costs, better staff retention and engagement, higher work quality, and reputational gains sciencedirect.com+10cisl.cam.ac.uk+10researchgate.net+10.
States with minimum wage increases saw reductions in adult suicide rates—estimates suggest $1 rises could prevent tens of thousands of suicides between 1990–2015 en.wikipedia.org.
In summary:
Real Living Wage policies deliver robust, measurable benefits:
Workers gain stability, better health, mental well-being, and reduced poverty.
Employers benefit from reduced turnover, boosted morale/productivity, and cost savings in recruitment/training.
Communities/municipalities see economic uplift, reduced reliance on public assistance, and improved public health.
Effectiveness often depends on design: living wages tied to businesses receiving municipal assistance generally show stronger, more consistent positive outcomes than contractor-only models .
Bottom line:
A broad body of high-quality evidence supports the Real Living Wage as a powerful tool to improve economic security, health, and productivity—while also boosting business performance and cutting public costs. Let me know if you’d like specific case studies or data from particular regions!