Re-establish USIA (United States Information Agency), USIA 2.0

"Information and education are powerful forces in support of peace. Just as war begins in the minds of men, so does peace. " President Dwight Eisenhower, January 27, 1958

POLICY IDEA:

The primary idea behind this policy is to protect the American public against bad information, propaganda, and irresponsible media practices.

To do so, resurrect the United States Information Agency under a new mission: to protect the quality and integrity of our domestic information structure.

  • USIA 1.0 Mission:

USIA 2.0 MISSION:

  1. Protect and defend the information landscape within the United States in the best interests of the American public.

  2. If there are whistleblowers who have revelations regarding misinformation being levied upon the American public, the USIA 2.0 would be compelled to move with that information (in conjunction with other federal departments). The USIA would work to ensure that their revelations could be protected and eventually shared with the public.

  3. If it is found that other areas of the US government are propagandizing the American public (e.g. the intelligence agencies), it would be the mandate of the USIA 2.0 to participate in countering these measures in cooperation with other government agencies.

  4. If it is found that information vendors and publishers are developing monopolies that are preventing the free flow of information, it would be the agency’s responsibility to make that known so legal action could be taken against these profiteers who are betraying their vocational duties.

  5. If media outlets have concern about corporate capture of their outlets, they could raise these concerns to this agency.

  6. Advise the President and U.S. government policy-makers on trends in the information landscape, evolutions in information science technology, concerns in the field of information science and journalism, etc.

**In 1999 this agency was swallowed by the US Department of State. If this agency were to be resurrected, my policy suggestion includes moving it out from under the umbrella of the DOS. It must be an independent agency.

DON’T WE WANT LESS NOT MORE GOVERNMENT?

I agree with Elon Musk that government agencies ought to be rolled back. However, the threat of propaganda and the desire to manipulate the free flow of information will never go away. All this policy idea wants to suggest, is whether a public agency with the focus solely on protecting the information landscape would be in the best interests of the American public.

With good information you are powerful, with bad information you are open to manipulation. Information is power. Information is freedom. Mostly, I believe in keeping government out of our lives, but this agency could potentially improve the quality of our broadcasters/journalism as well as defend the consumers of information at the national level.

Given that this agency already existed, my hope is that makes it easier to get this ball rolling faster.

LIBRARIANS, THE SUPERHEROES YOU’VE NEVER HEARD OF:

I work in the field of information science, and my belief is that librarians are needed now more than ever. Librarian training is no longer just about how to work in a library. It’s about applying the skills and vocational duties that have always belonged to librarians, in new contexts that have popped up in our Information Age.

The librarians, historically speaking, are the stewards of information. We know how to protect it for posterity, how to curate it to highlight what’s happening (many librarian trained people go into museum work), we know how to classify it to make easily discoverable, and we are now being trained on the cyberattack side of things. By nature, our work is bipartisan. Why am I saying all of this? Because these are the types of professionals I would love USIA 2.0 to employ. Not just people who come up from journalistic circles, or public policy circles, but people who have been trained in information.

RELEVANT LINKS:

The only way that this would work as I see it would be if the agency was audited regularly and if the people were to be censored there should be an open door for them to bring their grievance to the agency and receive updates on the actions the agency takes to correct it.

1 Like

NO NO NO! USIA was a propaganda machine to influence, manipulate, and monitor foreign audiences and was comprised largely of people in the intel community (OSS is one of the originators of USIA/USIS). It still operates at the Dept. of State (GEC is just one part) and the U.S. Agency for Global Media (formerly Broadcasting Board of Governors) but has now been turned against our own people when Smith-Mundt was “modernized” in 2012. Shut it all down permanently- remove the remnants that still thrive because they are the social media influencers, propagandists, and misinformation spreaders through their crafted narratives pushed in our news. Better off to mandate and regulate fair reporting in news agencies and sever the relationship our government has with the media and end all funding to them. If the news media can’t be fair, they get labeled “Opinion” not “News.”

1 Like

Yes, this idea was for USIA 2.0 as heading in exactly the opposite direction of USIA 1.0 (namely, a domestic and anti-propaganda focus).

That said, it’s understandable to suggest that old remnants of bad systems can’t be fashioned to better ends. You could be right about that.

I also wondered whether a federal agency was the best way to go about trying to protect the American public against manipulative lies. I tried to put that lack of certainty in the policy suggestion. Maybe it’s not the right path, but maybe it will give people food for thought.

To those in this thread who suggested that the old USIA system is too corrupt, I might suggest that you watch this Nicole Shanahan podcast (x.com). It got me wondering that looking towards a USIA 2.0 might have an added benefit: drudging up old vestiges of corrupt systems that appear to still be functioning even though the Cold War is long over.
Maybe USIA 2.0 is not just about protecting us from domestic propaganda. Maybe USIA 2.0 could also serve as taking out old trash.
Of course, this might be too idealistic, but I thought it should be said at least.