I’d appreciate if RCV advocates stopped promoting the instant runoff model, and went with a Condorcet model like Ranked Robin. The most egregious failures of RCV are from the way it counts ballots, leading to inefficiencies in administration, and mistrust in the results, which can seem chaotic.
Ranked Robin is both simpler to administer, and more intuitive: People are already used to the idea of a sports tournament (i.e. a “Round Robin”), where teams play against each other, and the team who wins the most games is crowned the champion. Likewise, in Ranked Robin, the candidates are considered in head-to-head comparisons, and the candidate who beats the most others is elected. In the case of a tie, the candidate with the largest margins wins - similar to how teams that score more goals are placed higher in championship rankings.