Purpose: To establish a mechanism whereby local sheriffs can act upon citizen complaints to arrest public officials for actions believed to be in direct violation of their sworn oath to the Constitution, thereby preventing constitutional overreaches and maintaining the integrity of our democratic institutions.
Preamble: Recognizing the sanctity of constitutional rights and the oath sworn by public servants to uphold these rights, this proposal seeks to empower local law enforcement, specifically sheriffs, with the authority necessary to address and rectify instances where public officials might act in ways that undermine the Constitution.
Key Provisions:
- Definition of Constitutional Violation:
- Legal Framework: Introduce a statutory definition of what constitutes a “Violation of Constitutional Oath” for public servants. This would include but not be limited to, issuing directives or laws that clearly contravene explicit constitutional protections without proper legislative or judicial review.
- Citizen Complaint System:
-
Complaint Filing: Establish a formal process for citizens to file complaints directly with the local Sheriff’s Office regarding unconstitutional actions by public officials.
-
Review Process: Complaints would be reviewed by a newly formed Constitutional Review Panel, consisting of legal experts and community representatives, within 72 hours of filing to determine if there’s a prima facie case of a constitutional oath violation.
- Sheriff’s Authority:
-
Arrest Powers: Upon confirmation by the Review Panel, sheriffs would be granted the authority to arrest the public official, with the condition that this action be immediately followed by a judicial review.
-
Training: Sheriffs’ offices would receive specialized training on constitutional law to ensure proper understanding and application of this authority.
- Judicial Review and Safeguards:
-
Expedited Court Process: Arrested officials would be brought before a judge within 24 hours for an immediate hearing to determine the legality of the arrest and the continuation of the case.
-
Checks and Balances: Implement a system where an independent state or federal commission oversees the implementation to prevent political misuse, ensuring that the process is not abused for partisan reasons.
- Public Servant Accountability:
-
Temporary Removal: Upon arrest, the official would be temporarily removed from office, with their duties assumed by an interim appointee until the legal proceedings conclude.
-
Legal Consequences: Define penalties for proven constitutional violations, which could include disqualification from holding public office.
- Implementation and Oversight:
-
Legislative Action: Require state legislatures to pass laws enabling this system, with federal oversight for consistency across states.
-
Regular Reporting: Sheriffs’ offices would need to report annually on the use of these powers, with transparency in outcomes to maintain public trust.
- Educational Outreach:
- Public and Law Enforcement Education: Develop programs to educate both the public and law enforcement on constitutional rights, the implications of the oath of office, and this new system’s operation.
Rationale: This proposal addresses the need for immediate accountability, particularly in situations where executive actions might infringe on constitutional rights, as exemplified by the New Mexico governor’s temporary suspension of the Second Amendment.
By empowering local sheriffs with this authority, it aims to:
-
Prevent Citizen Vigilance: Reduce the likelihood of citizens taking law enforcement into their own hands by providing an official channel for redress.
-
Uphold Constitutional Integrity: Ensure that public officials remain accountable to their constitutional oaths in a timely manner.
-
Maintain Public Order: Provide a structured, legal method for addressing perceived overreaches of power, thus maintaining stability and trust in governmental processes.
Conclusion: The PSCA Act proposes a balanced approach to enforce constitutional compliance among public servants, reinforcing the democratic principle that government officials are subject to the same laws they are sworn to uphold. By integrating rigorous legal oversight and public involvement, this proposal seeks to safeguard constitutional rights while respecting the democratic process.