Proposal: Legislative Transparency and Modernization Act of 2028

Legislative Transparency and Modernization Act of 2028

Purpose: To revolutionize the federal legislative process by promoting full transparency from the earliest stages of bill drafting, fostering public engagement, and enhancing accountability throughout the legislative journey. While the framework is established for federal use, state and local governments are encouraged to adopt similar models, utilizing the provided infrastructure as desired. This act aims to rebuild public trust by providing unprecedented access to the inner workings of the legislative process.

Continuing Government Modernization Efforts:

Over the years, the U.S. government has made continuous efforts to modernize and improve transparency. Notable milestones include the Open Government Initiative (2009) and the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act) of 2014, which expanded public access to financial and operational data. However, these initiatives primarily focused on government spending and data transparency rather than the legislative process itself.

The Legislative Transparency and Modernization Act of 2028 builds on these efforts by introducing a more targeted approach: making the legislative process transparent from the moment a bill is drafted to its final passage. This proposal bridges the gap between existing modernization efforts and the public’s need to be involved in how laws are shaped, providing a real-time, accessible window into the entire legislative process. This act represents the next step toward a 21st-century democracy that is more open, accountable, and participatory.

Public Access to Federal Legislative Bills from Inception

Proposal: All federal legislative bills must be publicly available from their initial drafts through a centralized, government-managed digital platform. This platform will track every bill’s comprehensive history using version control technology to monitor changes, identify authors, and provide explanations for amendments. Each draft and revision will be time-stamped, allowing for near real-time clarity on how legislation evolves.

Why It’s Necessary: Currently, bills are only made public after formal introduction, which leaves much of the legislative development hidden. This gap in transparency leaves citizens and stakeholders uninformed about the critical decisions made behind the scenes. By making bills accessible from the start, this proposal provides the public with full visibility into how legislation is shaped. This enhanced transparency will reduce surprises and ensure greater lawmaker accountability throughout the process.

Public Participation and Feedback on Federal Bills

Proposal: The platform will enable continuous public feedback throughout the lifecycle of every bill. Citizens will have the opportunity to provide comments, critiques, and suggestions, while legislators will be required to review this feedback periodically and respond to how it influenced their decisions. A ranking system will highlight the most constructive or popular suggestions.

Why It’s Necessary: Traditional methods of public engagement, like hearings, are often limited in scope and accessibility. This proposal enhances public participation by enabling a direct, ongoing channel for citizens to interact with the legislative process. Lawmakers will benefit from a broader range of perspectives, and the public will feel more connected to and informed about the laws that affect their lives.

Transparency of Federal Legislative Committees and Deliberations

Proposal: All committee meetings, including deliberations, debates, and votes, will be recorded and made publicly available through the platform. Amendments or modifications made during these sessions will be updated in real time, accompanied by explanations from committee members.

Why It’s Necessary: Committee meetings are often where the most substantive legislative decisions are made, yet public access to these sessions is limited and delayed. By making these processes fully transparent and immediately accessible, this provision ensures that committee decisions are open to public scrutiny, preventing opaque decision-making and ensuring lawmakers remain accountable.

Disclosure of Lobbyist and Special Interest Influence on Federal Legislation

Proposal: All interactions between federal legislators and lobbyists or special interest groups, especially those influencing specific bills, will be disclosed on the platform. Legislators will submit detailed reports outlining the nature of these meetings, including which legislative aspects were discussed or amended.

Why It’s Necessary: Lobbyists and special interest groups have a significant influence on legislation, but their activities often occur outside public view. This proposal aims to provide full disclosure of these interactions, reducing public distrust and ensuring that citizens understand how external parties are shaping federal laws.

Candidate Transparency on Federal Policy Proposals

Proposal: Candidates for federal office will be encouraged to publish draft versions of their policy proposals on the platform, allowing the public to track changes and see how positions evolve. Candidates will be required to update their drafts and provide detailed explanations for revisions.

Why It’s Necessary: Campaign rhetoric often leaves voters without a clear understanding of how policies will be implemented. This proposal holds candidates accountable by ensuring that draft versions of their proposals are publicly accessible, giving voters a clear view of how policy ideas may evolve before election day.

Federal Platform Infrastructure and Local Government Recommendations

Proposal: While the platform will be developed and mandated for federal use, local governments are encouraged but not required to adopt similar transparency measures. The federal platform will be available for local governments to use or customize for their needs.

Why It’s Necessary: Local governments handle important legislative matters that affect citizens directly, but they may have different technological capabilities and resources. By providing a flexible model, this proposal encourages transparency at all levels of government while respecting local autonomy.

Evaluation of Existing Version Control Systems

Proposal: The federal government will evaluate existing version control systems, such as GitHub or similar tools, to determine whether they can be adapted for legislative use, reducing development costs and streamlining implementation.

Why It’s Necessary: Building a new platform from scratch can be costly, but many core functionalities—like version tracking and real-time updates—are already available in existing systems. This evaluation ensures the government chooses the most efficient and cost-effective option, saving time and resources.

Core Goal: Expanding Transparency and Real-Time Updates

Proposal: The fundamental goal of this act is to provide transparency from the inception of bills and ensure that changes are tracked and displayed in near real time. Public engagement, scrutiny, and input are core components of this proposal.

Why It’s Necessary: Currently, the legislative process lacks visibility, particularly in the early stages. By providing real-time updates, citizens will be empowered to understand and influence the legislative process before final decisions are made, leading to a more engaged and informed electorate.

Oversight and Compliance

Proposal: An independent oversight body will be established to monitor the platform, ensure compliance with transparency rules, and perform regular audits. The body will also recommend improvements as needed.

Why It’s Necessary: For this transparency system to work, it must be free from political influence and subject to rigorous oversight. Regular audits and evaluations will ensure that the system continues to meet public engagement and transparency goals.

Funding and Resources

Proposal: Adequate funding will be provided to develop, implement, and maintain the platform. Grants will be available to local governments that wish to adopt the platform, ensuring they have the resources to participate without bearing the full financial burden.

Why It’s Necessary: A platform of this scale requires substantial investment for both initial development and ongoing maintenance. Providing grants ensures that local governments can participate, promoting transparency across all levels without imposing unfunded mandates.

Applicability and Scope

Proposal: The act applies specifically to the federal legislative process, with local governments encouraged to adopt similar measures. Technical and financial support will be provided to assist local governments that wish to implement the platform.

Why It’s Necessary: While federal transparency is critical, local governments also handle legislative work that directly impacts citizens. This proposal ensures flexibility and scalability, allowing local governments to benefit from increased transparency without facing burdensome federal mandates.

The Legislative Transparency and Modernization Act of 2028 is a vital step forward in the ongoing effort to modernize and improve government transparency. By providing real-time public access to the legislative process, ensuring public participation, and establishing a centralized platform that can be used by federal and local governments alike, this act builds on the foundation of past initiatives like the Open Government Initiative and the DATA Act. It is designed to foster a more open, accountable, and participatory democracy that adapts to the needs of the digital age.

Draft Legislative Text Below

3 Likes

Would you be interested in adding to this the elimination of omnibus bills, and a limit of 5 pages for any bill with a requirement that the bill be drafted in “laymans terms?” If you agree, that is.

1 Like

I don’t think this specific legislative action should be aimed at eliminating Multi-purpose bills. Because this is to improve the process, not the substance of legislative action. To your very point about eliminating omnibus bills, this bill shouldn’t do more than it’s intended.

Regarding keeping bills in layman’s terms, I would argue that that could be dedicated to a section of a bill or in a proposal because technical verbig is sometimes important to keep bills narrow and scope and to ensure that they’re doing the right thing.

1 Like

That makes sense.

1 Like