Due to the covert and overt destructive nature of Globalism, prevent anyone who is considered a Globalist from entering and doing business in the US.
The US is currently in the process of ‘you will own nothing and be happy’. To prevent this Globalist agenda from proceeding, US leaderships should create a policy and restrictions, just like communists in the 1960s, to stop the Globalist-Marxist agenda and return the US to the freedom of Americans.
Who’s responsible for determining who would be declared a ‘globalist’?
What about individuals who are US Citizens?
Great questions.
The government doesn’t have a great track record with deciding who is the “right” people to be doing things. (Buck v Bell comes to mind and all the following decisions based off that)
Anyone who calls themselves Globalists. Anyone who participates in the World Economic Forum. Anyone who is associated with them and who do business with them.
… so everyone?
At this point in time, yeah, a lot of people. It seem this number is a devastatingly colosal number.
If nothing is done, kiss the future goodbye with a real totalitarian boot over a society’s johnson forever. Kiss the idea of freedom and independence goodbye. You will literally eat the bugs, live in the pods and ‘own nothing and be happy’.
Ok, lets play this out -
What metrics do you propose that we enact that labels someone a ‘globalist’?
You’ve already mentioned self-proclaimed, WEF members, and anyone who does business with them?
What about a college student who writes a pro-globalist paper? And their family can be considered to be ‘doing business’ with them - especially if their parents paid for the education. Oh - now they graduated and got a job… guess the employers now fall under this category.
I get where you are coming from - but the implementation of this is just … just terrible. As I’ve stated earlier, the Government does not have a great track record for determining the who ‘right’ kind of people are. And under your proposal we’d be giving them the authority to make those poor decisions again.
Simply put, those who have evidence of Gl0balist ties and activities. A college student who writes a paper on Gl0balism has no ties. Not unless they actually have involvment or ties to people who are actually actively pushing gl0balist agendas. Let the evidence speak for itself.
What is ‘active involvement’? Break it down from a legal point of view - where is your line?
Wave a magic wand and make the globalists disappear?
Posted from my iphone? When’s the last time you had a pepsi? Or went online?
You’re confusing legislative power with the power of the purse. The world is what we make of it. The most important vote you will ever make is cast from your very own wallet, and you cast this vote every single day of your life.
Please allow me to clarify and assist in a better focus point for your apparent position. / Contentious consumerism with a consistent emphasis on decentralization and smaller government.
The well informed consumers drive the market which either supports or diminishes any companies corporate presence and power. That is who ‘globalists’ are, a consortium of very powerful wealthy individuals and the various corporations behind them. / Decentralization is the answer to an excess of bureaucratic activity. You know, buy local, support local businesses around you. And don’t answer the door if a government person comes knocking. Always seek to pay less taxes in order to stop feeding the beast. Read my lips; no new taxes. The answer to an oversized government is to stop feeding it’s growth.
And finally, take away the source of illicit funding. What if I told you a private organization counterfeited trillions of your dollars and gave it to their insider friends. Consistently devaluing your currency in a process you know as quantitative easing, which follows a flawed economic theory of ‘prosperity through debt’. The Federal Reserve. A hundred years of not being federal. And not having any reserves.
Article 1 Section X on sound money.
We need to send this guy an infowars bumper sticker asap.
