Presidential Appointment of Cabinet without Senate Nomination

Proposal for Constitutional Amendment

Title: Amendment to Allow Presidential Appointment of Cabinet without Senate Nomination

Preamble: The governance structure of the United States, as delineated by the Constitution, aims to balance power among its branches to ensure effective, efficient, and aligned administration. However, the current system wherein the President must seek the “advice and consent” of the Senate for Cabinet appointments can lead to political gridlock, particularly when the Senate’s interests or external influences do not align with the elected President’s policy objectives or administrative goals. This amendment seeks to rectify this by granting the President the authority to appoint Cabinet members freely, reflecting the mandate given by the electorate.

Text of the Proposed Amendment: "Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution shall be amended as follows:

  • Current Text: ‘He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.’

  • Amended Text: ‘He shall have Power to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: except for the principal officers of the executive departments, where the President shall appoint these officers without the need for Senate advice and consent. The Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.’

Rationale: The rationale for this amendment is rooted in the principle that the President, as elected by the people, should have the autonomy to form an administration that directly reflects the electorate’s choice and the President’s political agenda without undue interference. This change would:

  1. Streamline Government Operations: By reducing the potential for political obstruction, this amendment would allow for a more immediate and effective implementation of the President’s policy initiatives.

  2. Enhance Electoral Accountability: The voters elect the President with the expectation that their chosen leader can execute their vision through a team they trust. This amendment ensures that the public’s vote directly influences government composition.

  3. Reduce External Influence: This amendment would limit the ability of special interest groups or foreign entities to influence U.S. executive policy through the Senate confirmation process.

  4. Preserve Checks and Balances: While this amendment would remove the Senate’s role in Cabinet appointments, other checks and balances remain intact, including oversight through legislative powers, budget control, and the impeachment process.

Implementation: The amendment would require the standard process for constitutional amendments under Article V, including proposal by two-thirds of both Houses of Congress or by a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the state legislatures, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states.

Conclusion: This amendment aims to foster a more direct and less contentious path from election to administration, ensuring that the President’s mandate is not diluted by the political machinations of the Senate, thereby enhancing democratic governance.

1 Like

Isn’t odd that the new President was elected November 5th but we have to wait until January 20th?!. In the 1700s and 1800s the votes had to be delivered by horse and buggy. I get it. Now by the stroke of a key results can now be sent within seconds. Amend the time interval from November 5th to December 5th! The old occupants should already be packing instead of creating billions of dollars of mischieviousness.

2 Likes

Checks and balances are essential for ALL people… The Biden family showed criminality opportunities in the open corruption display that included government seats and chairs and nothing was done about it. This is a backdoor for corruption for all of the types of people that are against the peoples rights. Leave the people and citizens checks and balances alone. Since the one sided government robbed tax payers and China paid influence, we have suffered enough.

1 Like

I agree with you within weeks of votes the new president SHOULD take office upon voting being confirmed. As we always end up with this election then current administration trying to build damns to stop the incoming admin. So either they should take office or old admin should be restrained from pushing bills and laws for last 2 months. This is not due to what is currently going on but goes on EVERY 4 years.

2 Likes