Policy on Financial Transaction Freedom

Purpose:
This policy aims to protect the rights of individuals to use their financial resources for legal purchases, without interference from financial institutions based on content type or moral judgments. Payment processors and credit card companies must operate as neutral entities, respecting legal freedoms and personal autonomy in financial decisions.


1. Right to Lawful Transactions

Financial institutions and payment processors must facilitate transactions for all legal goods and services, without discrimination or restriction based on the nature of the content, provided it is legal under applicable law.

2. Non-Discrimination Clause

No financial entity may deny service, restrict funds, or apply additional fees based solely on the content type or industry of a legal transaction (e.g., adult entertainment, firearms, political materials). Decisions on service restrictions should solely reflect a transaction’s legal status and compliance with regulatory frameworks, not the nature of the content.

3. Transparency and Justification Requirement

If a transaction is blocked or a merchant restricted, the institution must provide a transparent, itemized rationale to the customer, explaining the legal basis and compliance reasons for the decision. Vague explanations, such as “high-risk,” are insufficient without further clarification on specific risk or compliance issues.

4. Consumer Autonomy and Privacy Protection

Individuals retain the right to control their spending on lawful goods and services without undue scrutiny. Financial institutions should commit to safeguarding consumer privacy, refraining from tracking or profiling based on purchasing behaviors, unless required by law for anti-fraud purposes.

5. Fair Appeals Process

Financial institutions must establish a clear appeals process for consumers and merchants who wish to contest a restriction. This process should involve an independent review and offer an avenue for reinstating blocked services if transactions are found to be in full legal compliance.

6. Commitment to Neutrality

Payment processors must commit to content neutrality, avoiding judgments on or against legal industries. This includes avoiding restrictions influenced by political, moral, or activist pressures that do not directly relate to legal and regulatory compliance.

7. Government and Regulatory Oversight

Regulatory agencies should oversee and ensure compliance with this policy, imposing penalties for unjustifiable transaction restrictions. An independent regulatory body may conduct regular audits and provide a reporting mechanism for consumers or merchants who believe their rights under this policy are violated.


This policy seeks to ensure that lawful economic activities are respected and that financial institutions function as unbiased facilitators of transactions, upholding consumer rights and autonomy over their financial choices.

1 Like

I don’t have p problem with my banking. They call me if we spend to much money in a place far away after a day. And then they deny if it’s out of the country. But I call and they approve if I say so.
Not sure what the rest is.

I think u completely missed the point. Look what happened in canada to the trucker protests.

Nothing like that has ever happened to us. Or anyone close to us. So no didn’t know it happened often.

There’s plenty of government agencies that are already utilizing the credit card companies to destroy businesses that they don’t approve of.

There’s a company that creates CNC machines exclusively for the personal use in the manufacture of firearms. Because it’s not illegal federal agencies have gone to the credit card companies to create a situation where they don’t process transactions for said company. The company has to use cashier’s checks for payments. Also they have created a situation where they have to use a special Shipping Company because agencies have leaned so hard on ups and Federal Express that they won’t handle any deliveries from said company. It’s already happening here

2 Likes

Why bother making something illegal when you can just make it impossible to buy or to ship? Why eliminate a product from the market legally when you can just destroy that company financially?

1 Like

Additional details on the Solari site: The Solari Report: Financial Transaction Freedom