An age old invalid argument. Also the topic of almost every state sponsored religion in Europe during the Age of Enlightenment.
Religion doesn’t equal morality. Morality comes from human nature, as does depravity.
Than why don’t you make this your proposal? If the enforcement is the issue, than you should be enforcing the Law rather than restricting our rights.
Our Entire ideology is built upon government being Tyrannical, and preparing for it to become tyrannical again.
Make a proposal about upholding oaths, and enforcement of punishment. If no one is getting punished, get up and do it yourself.
This is a generalization. Actions speak louder than words. Watch the video you shared. That man is Islamic, and seeks to reform his religion, as it doesn’t accept him, and hides from shame. He isn’t a liar.
You just shared a video that directly identified the internal conflict that is happening within Islam. Lots of these people aren’t like this, and we have laws in place to protect from this. If the person is lying like you suggest they will, the people would be sanctioning the promises they made during their campaign, and should take proper response to them not following through with what they promised.
Some believed Africans and Natives weren’t people, thus the 3/5ths Comprimise. Society changes and evolves. Yes the success of our government and retention of our rights hinges on the morality of our populous, yet as I stated above, religion does not equal morality. As All three Abrahamic religions support immoral actions. Morality can be found in every religion. Depravity can be found in every religion.
The People. Guns. If they’re openly vowing to overthrow the Constitution, first off, they didn’t lie. Secondly, if they openly vow such a thing, they wouldn’t get elected, due to the moral mentality of the populous. Third, if they got elected illegally, then it’s time to reinstate your Constitution, by he same means as your fore-Fathers. 1776 style.
As for your 6th point, that link is the entire reason I suggested secular orientation of courts by Congress, also to give you somthing valid.
You’re ignoring the fact that the UK has also established just as many Beth Din (Jewish courts) which are still unconstitutional. Why don’t you add that? Or is it just Islam youre after. It’s redundant, as the Supremacy Clause and the 1st Amendment restricts the establishment of a religion and upholds the Constitution as the highest Law of the land → meaning any decisions made in said courts could be easily overruled by any US court.
The REAL bottom line is our unapportioned Representatives and taxes, which are treasonously used to fund foreign religious/ideological conflicts around the globe. Your politicans are paid-for actors through special interest lobbying, they rake in millions on the suffering of others. Including Americans.
This entire proposal is a distraction from the founational solutions that the US needs.