This paragraph is better than the entirety of the actual proposal above. Removing religion from the equation is the only unifying constitutional way forward.
Yet, the moment an Office holder begins preaching an idea of radicalism and change of government form, it’s up to the people to make educated choices based on the actions of their constituents, not necessarily through a series of guardrails.
For example, if someone of the Islamic belief ran for office on a platform of actual liberty and constitutionalism, the people should be able to look past their existentialism for the preservation of one another.
Yet, if someone of the same belief ran on a platform of extremeist ethnic religious policies, the people have the responsibility to not vote them in, for the longevity of our republic.
Granted our rights and the functionality of our representation is secured-which it is not.