No More Family Movies with Homosexuality

The problem is we have a media-driven profit culture that has been profiting more and more, ever since the 1970s, on the primary precept that “sex sells.” The wealthy people steering this capitalist bonanza misrepresent biological “science” in an attempt to achieve their “wealth-ist” (those with the most money are always right and meant to rule) political and financial ends. The root of much of it was the 1973 Roe v Wade decision which has been teaching every generation born since that all human relationship is based in, and derives from our sexuality (see RIGHT TO MATERNAL/FETAL HEALTHCARE & EDUCATION to stabilize the abortion issue - #187 by PeoplesMandate for just a tip discussion of that destructive iceberg trying to be law that has dictated an ugly amount of our healthcare being taken over by politics and lunatic greed for more than half a century).

A vast majority of human relationship has nothing to do with sex drive and is not directed by hormonal urges, but the teaching of this falsehood as truth has caused untold damage to this society as a whole as well as most of the individuals in it.

Hallmark and other channels like them have bought into this incorrect information to the point of it having become a “belief” system that demands representation of homosexual couples as a part of “normal” life, as if being homosexual is the equivalent of being of a particular race or gender, or having blue eyes or red hair (which are biological “fact”-for lack of a better word, and thus genetically determined). It’s a misguided effort attempting to enlighten everyone and thwart societal prejudice (the road to Hell, as they say, is paved with good intentions). We’re not, as human beings, mere insects doing a constant mating dance. Our behaviors are determined, and controlled, by a significant number of factors including higher thought as a result of education, and that independent determinism known as “free will” (the only “right” Roe should have reinforced for women was the right to say, “No.”) As you note, it is in the miseducation of young people about human relationship with respect to Love where it does the most potential damage.

Legitimate Love (which is absolutely free, always under individual control-and always will be), which occurs in private intimacy between individual human beings of all ages, genders, races, (even ideologies and ethnicities), etc. is a fundamental need. Sexual activity is not a need (at best it is, at times, a very compelling “want”–and for men especially, also an addiction–which is a very different discussion), but the “wealth-ists” running this society have been conning everyone to believe having sex is a need, including, for women, a huge economic one, and laughing all the way to the bank about it as they count their still more billion$.

The conflation of homosexuality, and in particular, the teaching of homosexual stereotype, which is behavior (and comes under the heading of the realm known as “acting” much more so than the science known as biology), with legitimate biological phenotype–i.e. what we are as a result of expression of specific genes that determine things such as a person’s skin or hair or eye color or gender, is a dangerous step onto the proverbial “slippery slope.” If all manner of behavior is argued as needing to be tolerated, and even venerated, as if it is just an expression of someone’s fundamental genetic reality, then there are no grounds for having laws that stipulate unacceptable behavior such as stealing or murder.

The media, money and sex-driven culture has seemingly pushed US to this point. It’s time we demand public institutions learn accurate biological science, what is, and more importantly, isn’t, genetically “programmed” (if you will) and thus beyond the control of the individual, and represent these things accordingly and accurately, especially to young people.

3 Likes

What’s wrong with the 1950’s? Peak prosperity. Strong healthy intact families. No fags, no gender disphoria, no culture wars, or major political divides. Strong thriving communities. Great cars. Sturdy goods. No confusion about who the communists were who were universally hated, and exposed for the enemy they are. Way less bullshit and corruption being pushed in schools and television. White Christian society and values were the norm and revered. Less crime. People didn’t have to lock their doors. There was such a thing as decency laws, which none of this lgbtq tranny stuff could ever pass. Sounds amazing. Let’s go back!

It’s funny how degeneracy and progress go hand in hand.

Progress means degeneracy.

Let’s go back.

1 Like

Very good points. And I would add, the “sex sells” traces back to Freud, and his nephew Bernays (both jews) Bernays wrote the book Propaganda where he explains how the tobacco companies hired him to figure out a way to sell more cigarettes. That’s when in the 30’s, it was still socially unacceptable for women to smoke. Bernays came up with the plan to advertise in magazines and billboards images of women smoking. Cigarette company profits began to double and triple. The reason being is all the ads were sexually suggestive. In other words, hijacking primitive biological nature’s of the publics brains.

Pre 1930’s there was not advertising fir every single product on the market. Most items were simply available. You knew where to find them at your local store, or in the sears catalog. Suddenly this new psychological subconcious power was unleashed on the public, and more and more ads contained sexualized marketing.

Was the public ever asked for permission to do this? Did they ever vote, or consent?

Perfect example of profits prioritized over people and the interests of the public. No checks and balances yet exist for this, and the people continue to be manipulated towards a depraved existence. Coupled with the policies of the Frankfurt school in the late 50’s that led to the sexual revolution of the 60’s, the enemy has had a lock on manipulating the public without their consent or knowledge.

I would also point out the work of Dr. White who’s studies prove homosexuality is a choice. People are not born that way. Published in JAMA.

Ever since, political pressure exponentially increased to remove homosexuality as mental illness from the dsm, with “no new medical information”. What that means is, all the research is settled. There’s no debate. All the rhetoric is political only, and not based on any medical or genetic findings. Nothing but pure political pressure only. FEELINGS. Not facts.

And the enemy who also owns the media prevents the public from knowing these facts by omission.

1 Like

We can all choose to change to channel, or better yet we can turn the wicked tell a lie television completely off. You’re the king or queen of your home. I agree it is a sin but we’ve got bigger issues that affect We The People a heck of a lot more.

Fully agree, but this isn’t taking responsibility for anything other than your home. It doesn’t take into consideration schools, public spaces, and communities as a whole. You cede control and responsibility to your enemy to seize control over those things including your television, media, and movies, which you don’t even require your permission to use to broadcast. You don’t charge fees, taxes, or penalties, or fines to them who inundate your community with garbage, because you relinquish your stake and responsibility in those things.

It’s YOUR community. It’s YOUR taxes that fund YOUR community schools that shape YOUR future generations minds. And all you selfishly care about is the boundary of your home.

I’m of the belief that those boundaries should be extended, and broadened to include more territory. You would object to anyone trespassing on your property, trespassingin YOUR community. your enemy has found ways to do that very thing. In and just outside the borders of your home, because you don’t insist on boundaries and limits within community property, which could so easily be defined to include reciprocal obligation to preserve the public trust. Which then requires punishments for violations. YOUR community is YOURS. The airwaves in YOUR community belongs to YOU and those in YOUR community. WHY would you allow YOUR enemy access to the resource of your communities airwaves, and fiberoptic infrastructures who has no stake and no responsibility for preserving or respect for YOUR community’s public trust. Why would you turn over access to your communities resources to those who have no stake in your communities success, and are actively working against you and your communities values? It all belongs to you, and you freely give it away with barely the faintest objection. If we can pass laws preventing and punishing pollution of public places, the same logic can be applied to ANY resource. Our schools, our children’s minds and future are a resource. Our airwaves and media, and ALL infrastructures are a resource. Why wouldn’t we assume responsibility for ALL of it!

This is a troll, trying to make MAHAs look nutty. Disengage.

2 Likes

While I agree, how is this a serious priority given all of the real problems we face as a society?

How is this a priority? Why is the present and future generations soundness of health, mind, body, spirit and sovereignty, and responsibility TO God, ourselves and those future generations that is our charge, ensuring they have well maintained uncorrupted resources and communities, adequate skills and know how to navigate life and have healthy intact families of their own in high trust communities, without being subjected to ideological subversions, and are not misled by these value corruptors in achieving dreams within a thriving culture that reflects, defends and protects and maintains our responsibilities and values important? What was I thinking.

1 Like

Gays are not a new phenomenon. Zeroing in on homosexuals while the world burns isn’t unlike complaining about your food tasting bad when it’s actually poison.

Wow. Big take. Also part of the equation. I like that you are increasing your responsibility boundary perimeter to include the food as well. It’s refreshing. Isn’t it? To consider retaking and reclaiming responsibility for things let go. Having a goal. That might even be easy to achieve. Maybe even far easier than we could possibly imagine. What’s the limit of what we can and ought to be responsible for. And where does our resistence to responsibility and success come from. The faithful are not alone. And Christ is King.

John 21:6

Then he said, “Throw out your net on the right-hand side of the boat, and you’ll get some!” So they did, and they couldn’t haul in the net because there were so many fish in it.

So let’s get some.

I’m not sure if you’re being sarcastic or not, but I just don’t see homosexuals as a threat to society. As much as I don’t understand it, I believe some people are born that way. I also believe that some people are so lonely and pathetic that they’ll do or say anything to belong to a group. People who are truly gay are obvious and I see no issue with them as long as they treat others well. It’s the people who are so hollow that they’d pretend to be something they’re not who truly terrify me.

1 Like

And yet the votes climb higher and higher. :sunglasses:You say pointless blather because you have no arguments and are left with only desperate slander because you have nothing to offer, and have no honor.

Ah you’re such a disappointment. I’m sure your predecessors feel the same way.

Well they are a threat. They’re not born that way, it’s a choice. See the research of Dr. White. His videos used to be on youtube before they were throttled. They’re disease carriers. They can’t procreate, so they insist on recruiting, and spreading their mental illness to others. They demand special considerations. You’re simply uninformed, misinformed, or lying.

How about a new Rating Label & slapping a Warning on the start of any film like we already do such as Violence, Language, Sex/Nudity, Drugs, Smoking, … and now add ‘Ghey Shite’.

The free market has done a great job lately cancelling movies with radical demoncrat propoganda - Joker 2, Snow White, Star Wars Acolyte Series, Wicked, etc .

Those who want to watch that crap will do so, and the studios that make junk will go broke. No need to make anything about it “illegal”.

Want to make something illegal? Go for the root. Let’s ban Satanism (see Russia).

1 Like

Cry more.

See a rating system at New Rating System to Inform Viewers of LGBT Content in TV Shows and Movies - #7 by DiveMaster

I would argue no authoritarianism is “healthy,” not the Christian kind, nor the lgbtq-alphabet, etc… false “science” kind. That’s where, and why, we (as in the human species, and Americans in particular, right now) are stuck.

Your judgement (i.e. opinion) of what is

when it lacks full understanding, i.e. compassion coupled with intelligence and information, always seeking, first, the Truth, fails, ultimately, the Christianity test, too.

Christ was a teacher, not someone looking to be a king. He had no political aspirations and wasn’t out to “win” anything, nor by equivalency, to “defeat” anyone (i.e. he saw no “enemy”–as you suggest elsewhere in this discussion), yet he “won” over much of the then civilized world, and his teachings, in Truth about life ‘science.’ not other men’s rhetoric about those teachings, have continued to do so for more than two thousand years since.

I would suggest what is missing from the Christian rhetoric, the religion, is that Christ was, ultimately the first great biology teacher. He understood LOVE as a “scientific” (for lack of a better word), universal, perpetual and eternal force and energy in the same way that Newton recognized gravity, or Franklin electricity, or Einstein relativity. He understood LOVE, unlike those other eternal forces and forms of energy, is the one immortal energy over which individuals, at least for a short space of Time, have some individual control, and that they are capable of the god-like ability to give Love away in a directed and specific manner, to put their Life energy out there, and at risk, on behalf of another, to give their “essence” that is Love to another …if they so choose. He knew that women understood this intrinsically in the process of bringing forth a new “life.” …And men, at Christ’s time, in the reality of the very human construct that is battle, and war.

Christ undoubtedly understood sex drive, too, as that great biologist, and as a man, what sex drive is for other men. He dedicated his very Life to educating the human race, and particularly men, to know that LOVE, and Love, are forces far beyond hormonal urges and orgasmic reward, that that is “the Truth” about Life which we must spend our Time learning to understand so that we can offer/pass this Truth on to the next generation, so we can teach, like the first great biology Teacher, because it is important every human being understand the God-force within and what can be accomplished with it while the matter that is the body still contains it. The material existence, the matter of the body, is finite; but Love is, and always will be part of the infinite.

And BTW, telling someone

is just plain rude, i.e. no more “loving” than authoritarianism is. The final point being there is no real “control” in this life (despite the human fantasy that is elections and government…and power derived from the fantasy that Time, itself, can be represented by mere money)…there is no control, other than what we decide, “choose” to do with our, individual, Love, each and every day that we live.

2 Likes

Government is not there to legislate morality. What your children are exposed to is your job. It is not the job of the government. If you set the precedent that they are allowed to do so, then your beliefs could be next. If you don’t like the content of something, voice your opinion in the free market. Also, We are not talking about pornography here, we are talking about relationships that really do exist in the real world. You can shade your children from all you want in your home but good luck with that in public.

1 Like

Were the same sex couples in those movies fucking? I ask, because if they were, I would also consider that very family un-friendly. Of course, I’d consider having opposite-sex couples screwing on film to be inappropriate as well. Is your objection to recognizing the existence of same sex couples?

1 Like

What do you feel started the collapse of our civilization?