You can discuss it, in terms of the forum it won’t interfere with your discussion on the topic, but when and if they access the application of your suggestion, I am assuming they will observe it was merged with another and access it as a whole. They may decide that this is not applicable, they may not even consider the merged topic as a possible constitutional addition but rather a united states justice code or some other judiciary definition to provide a baseline concept for “what is Bad Behavior”.
I suggested the merge to help consolidate concepts that the public considers “bad behavior” as a whole, though you and me are not the creators of that legislation, that resides in the executive branch and a constitutional amendment would be a act of congress.
The merge is just a way to help identify conditions of “bad behavior” it is not meant to remove the spotlight to your mention. It also provides a background for restrictions of lobbying and how we can better define what is acceptable by constitutional law.
Though chances are they will refuse to even highlight a single aspect of “bad behavior” so that they can continue to abuse and exploit the public. Presently there is no real determined concept of this, which shows just how exploitive and immoral present political members are. Just as they enjoy concepts of “insider trading” “kickbacks” “donations” “bribery” “unethical contract awards” “selling insider info” “foreign aid abuse” and many other clearly for self profit conditions.
Personally I think it needs to stop, all of it, but in terms of what is lawful and or ethical under fair use may reflect a little differently. The issue we see in politics today is, people become politicians not to server the country, or to make the republic of the union more perfect, to do what is moral and right, but solely to get rich and or famous.
This is highlighted by the wealth increase the moment they are elected as an official or placed into a position that gives them control of tax payer funding and even just access to people that have those abilities. These create for-profit systems of governance and selection of companies and organizations for contract awards or other funding use. To them we are just cash monkeys for them to exploit. Every member of office goes from a few hundred thousand dollars to multi million within a year, the same is said for those selected for key positions through appointment.
If you look at covid for instance, the shit has been proven to literally kill people, and they still blast it everywhere nonstop without even the slightest concern for public safety. This is because they are getting rich from it. Pharma pays allot of money and gives huge donations to everyone to peddle death for profit.
I am 100% in agreement with you voicing zero lobbying but I would like to see a definition of “bad behavior” to which restrains such aspects in a way that we can remove corrupt members from holding office, being employed by the government.