Menstrual leave 🩸

How uninspiring. May be time to scrap democracy. Repeal the 19th. And the Hart Cellar Act.
Real men love responsibilities, but not obligations to be continully ripped off. Nature seeks a balance of the scales. Can you sense it?

…I thought we had moved on to the point where the uterus were allowed to help…but if not, yes. The men who you are allowing to work would be responsible for paying all the taxes…which fund the government’s financial obligations. I don’t know what you want me to tell you….uteruses who don’t have jobs don’t pay taxes. Sorry, I wasn’t expecting this to be such a shock.

Here’s another shock. Men don’t need women to pay taxes. How many millions of men if I polled them to tell me the top 10 to 50 things they want or need women to do, would list paying taxes at all!?

And that right there should clue you in as to who benefits most from the women’s movement, “equality”, and women in the workforce. It’s not men, and it’s really not women, it’s not children, and it’s not families. A lot of them are really unhappy and shaving their heads right now. Why? They all got admitted into the gladiatorial arena! Is this not what they wanted?

Yes, very uninspiring. And now maybe you understand why us girls find dreaming of a time and place where painful reproductive organs don’t exist so riveting. We need some form of positivity in our lives…may we proceed with slightly less ridicule?

See, you don’t get it either. You haven’t differentiated the 2 issues.

Let’s try this again,

If I am required to take financial responsibility for your uterus, shouldn’t I have full access to it?

Ok…so then men pay all the taxes. I thought you didn’t want to do that? As a uterus I am very confused as to what you want from me…

1 Like

Well this conversation just got a little weird…no…consent is still required…even if you pay all the taxes.

1 Like

Agreed. Answers exist without gov programs, and women paying taxes. Imagine that!

But you have no problem extracting MY funds to pay for your uterus in an arrangement that only costs me and I get Zero benefit from, ALSO KNOWN AS THEFT, and you DON’T think THAT’S WEIRD??

@F.T…actually I was here advocating for women’s health research to understand the root causes of women’s health issues and develop effective treatments as a long term solution…and then I warned you about the national debt and things got outa hand.

1 Like

OK, but that’s not the policy proposal. I would support THAT, it’s not beneficial to men to have women going around with sick uteruses, but the policy was to give women paid leave to vacation time with their uterus, on my dime. See the difference?

@F.T Oh dear…I came to review a unique proposal and engage in discussion about an issue very unique to women. OP has been so kind, graceful and open I decided to stay and offer my thoughts on a long term solution that would hopefully resolve pain so we don’t have to experience it at home or at work or anywhere…If you find my lack of rigidity unnerving…I don’t know what to tell you.

1 Like

Making us healthy again will definitely have an impact

You get no arguement from me. I think we are on the same page here.

When I get a chance, I will respond to some
of the comments.

I’m glad to see different opinions on this! My random, 3am :bulb:, blurt out got some fuss. :joy:
I do want to take time to actually revise my policy idea and write a detailed proposal.
I’m leaning toward “Make the UTERUS healthy again” as my title and focus, but I still think we need work and school options.

Whether you like it or not…. it’s already happening. Women and Young women already call in to work, or miss school because of this. So some of the women on the opposing side sound so fake to me. But, I’ll leave that there until I can respond appropriately. I have to re-read some of the comments.

Thank you!!!
“Make the UTERUS Healthy AGAIN”.

1 Like

I’ve heard dark chocolate and pickle juice work. also wireless heating pads work wonders

You are sidestepping. Your acknowledgement and apology is what’s called for. Politics is a civilized substitute for actual warfare. Women don’t belong in this arena.

They issue is a proposed policy to extract/STEAL taxpayer funds to give women paid ME TIME. Everything else you’re trying to put on the table is sliding right off the table.

If you genuinely cared about this issue you would propose policy that addressed endometriosis research. You’re not.

Does it not dawn on you women that this research may already be taking place? Or that it could be funded privately?

But no, you want to extract money from others and make uteruses everyone’s priority and responsibility.

What happens if reasonable solutions to problems can’t be solved reasonably?

Women like to utilize ridicule, guilt, shame, etc. as a means of warfare to get what they want. They themselves are very sensitive to these weapons, so too they use them against men.

What happens when they no longer have the desired effect? What happens when men arrive at the end of their tolerance and patience with feminine tactics?

Uteri*

And no, I’m not advocating for welfare. We can already use PTO thats been EARNED, for whatever we want. I was saying in general it’s would be nice to have options, and people took it way left. Which is fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Some of these comments are long. When I get to a computer, I’ll read through them and give a detailed response. I can understand your perspective on some things, but you sound like you have a deeper issue with women. Lol

But I have to re-read some of the comments when I get a chance.

1 Like

Anyone here on this thread ever heard if the tragedy of the commons? If not watch any number of the brief yt videos on it, and then consider if it has anything to do with this proposal, and the the tax base in general.

I’m going to throw out a general number of I would guess 80% of women cannot actually comprehend or abide with solutions to the tragedy of the commons. They will still seek to steal, and justify stealing from their neighbor, so I think a fair proposal going forward would be to separate the tax base into factions. Basically male issues, and female issues. Since we’re all equal now, there should be no problem with making females pay, fund, steal, appropriate funds for THEIR issues and projects from women only. As long as females use tax funds generated by other females only, then I don’t even need to have a vote, or an opinion in matters pertaining to women’s issues or health. Right?