Mandatory National Military or Public Service Act

Background:
In recent history, the U.S. has seen a shift from mandatory military service to an all-volunteer force, amidst a backdrop of continuous military engagements often termed “forever wars.” This policy proposal revives the concept of mandatory service, but with a framework that reflects contemporary needs for both military and civil service, aiming to reinvigorate national unity, health, and civic responsibility. However, its implementation is contingent on a significant shift away from current military policies and political climates.

Objectives:

  1. Enhance National Unity and Civic Engagement: Promote a shared sense of duty and understanding among diverse populations.
  2. Improve Public Health: Structure service to include physical training and health education, combating national health issues like obesity and mental health crises.
  3. Foster Allegiance to Country: Through service, instill a deeper appreciation for democratic values and national identity.

Policy Details:

  1. Service Requirement:

    • All citizens and legal residents aged 18 to 28 must serve for one year in either military or civilian national service roles.
    • Deferments and exemptions will be available for medical, educational, or conscientious reasons, with clear criteria to prevent abuse.
  2. Service Options:

    • Military Service: Traditional military roles, including combat, support, and technical positions.
    • Civilian Service: Programs can include environmental conservation, public health initiatives, education, infrastructure development, disaster response, and community service.
  3. Post “Forever Wars” Implementation:

    • This policy will only be enacted after a clear withdrawal from prolonged military engagements not directly tied to immediate national defense needs.
    • Requires a shift in foreign policy away from neoconservative interventionism, ensuring that service isn’t misused for geopolitical strategies.
  4. Health and Education Benefits:

    • Comprehensive health screenings and fitness programs integrated into service training.
    • Education on civic duties, democracy, and U.S. history to foster informed patriotism.
  5. Economic and Social Benefits:

    • Service members receive a stipend during their service and a voucher for educational or vocational training upon completion.
    • Enhanced job prospects post-service due to the skills and discipline acquired.
  6. Implementation Phasing:

    • Phase 1: Legislative approval and framework development, including establishing new civilian service branches.
    • Phase 2: Pilot programs in select states to refine logistics, training, and service types.
    • Phase 3: Gradual nationwide rollout, starting with younger cohorts to manage integration.
  7. Oversight and Accountability:

    • A National Service Commission, appointed by Congress and the President, to oversee implementation, ensure fairness, and address abuses or inefficiencies.
    • Regular public and congressional reviews to adapt the program to changing national needs.

Rationale for Post-Neocon and Post-Forever Wars Implementation:

  • Restoration of Public Trust: The policy’s success depends on public trust in government not to misuse service for endless conflicts.

  • Focus on Service, Not Warfare: By ensuring service is oriented towards national development, community service, and defense readiness, rather than continual combat roles, it aligns more with civic duty than military expansionism.

  • National Unity: A common service experience can bridge divides, but only if perceived as serving the nation’s genuine interests, not foreign policy goals of a past era.

Conclusion:
This Mandatory National Service Act aims to rekindle the sense of community and duty that has historically been a cornerstone of American identity, while addressing modern societal issues like health and civic engagement. Its effectiveness, however, is critically tied to its implementation in a political climate that prioritizes national unity over international military strategies, ensuring it’s seen and utilized as a tool for national betterment rather than geopolitical maneuvering.

1 Like

I expect an exceptional number of “The Government doesn’t have my best interests at heart” exemptions to be filed.

Not even for the military part, but just in general.

Trust in government has to be rectified before I would every lobby for this policy. We cannot have a standing army when we are implicated in forever wars.

The nature of warfare is changing quite dramatically already. This policy is more for nationalistic reasons and the naturalization of public service as part of an American life.