Genocide - Revoke Bill Gate's Ownership of Farmland and Ban Apeel

Also, I have mentioned that Apeel needs to be investigated for its possible use of nanotech in organic food. So far the FDA does not detect nor look for nanotech in food, drugs, water supply, health products, and agriculture. Read more here and please vote to ban the use of nanotech in Food and Organic Food, Drugs, etc. Ban Nano-technology in Food, Drugs, Agriculture, Health Products, and Water

3 Likes

God’s most heavenly and holy blessings to each of you as the restoration begins. Perhaps we can train our veterans in holistic agriculture? Each willing veteran could go through a learning process and become mentored for land care and generational stewardship. ECHO farms in Florida could teach how to clean/generate nutrients for purifying the lands and water. Small local farm communities including learning Animal husbandry.

2 Likes

I’d rather see Bill Gates prosecuted for crimes against humanity. Part of his sentence can be seisure of the land to be given back to farmers he and the cabal put out of business.

3 Likes

Thank you for posting.

2 Likes

Yes!! Bill Gates shouldn’t be allowed to reside here. Period!

2 Likes

Totally agree. Gates is an enemy of America and should be stripped of his rights.

1 Like

Yes I’m glad this was put up

You’re missing the point. Bill Gates buys things with the intent to monopolize and allow his products, and ideology to dominate Americans. Remember, Bill Gates said, people should eat more synthetic meat, which financially benefits him. He has no right telling Americans what they should and should not be eating. The Bill we’re all supporting would prevent the monopolization of U.S. farmland by individuals. If you can’t understand that then you really should not be voting on the bill. For example the bill would state:

This policy seeks to prevent the monopolization of U.S. farmland by individuals, corporations, or foreign entities to safeguard economic equity, food security, and public health. Concentrating farmland ownership in the hands of a few diminishes competition, inflates land prices, and limits opportunities for small and mid-sized farmers, undermining rural communities and the agricultural sector. Monopolistic control also poses risks to food sovereignty, as profit-driven agricultural practices may compromise environmental sustainability, degrade soil health, and focus on producing nutritionally poor crops.

Furthermore, monopolized farmland ownership grants undue control over food systems, potentially reducing the variety and quality of food available to consumers. It encourages harmful practices like overusing chemicals that degrade soil, pollute water, and increase health risks. Large-scale landowners often prioritize cost-efficiency and mechanization, leading to job losses and reduced investment in the long-term sustainability of farming communities. By implementing policies that promote equitable land distribution and limit monopolistic and foreign ownership, the U.S. can foster a resilient agricultural sector that supports rural economies, protects food security, and ensures sustainable farming practices.

If one commits crimes against humanity or treason, they should be able to own nothing.