Free WiFi/internet in the United States, Extension of Affordable Connectivity Program

Extension of the New The Affordable Connectivity Program helped ensure that households were able to afford the broadband they needed for work, school, healthcare and more.

The New Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) is a U.S. federal program designed to provide affordable internet access to all households by offering subsidies to reduce or eliminate the cost of broadband services. Here’s how policies for extending free WiFi or internet through the New ACP might interact with satellite internet providers like Starlink or other technologies:

Extension of ACP for Free Internet

1.	Subsidies for Eligible Households:
•	The ACP provides up to $30 per month ($75 in tribal areas) for broadband services to all households for minimum services and incentives for homes needing more. Not mandatory for citizens. 
•	Policies to extend free WiFi may involve increasing the subsidy amount to fully cover costs or mandating providers to offer zero-cost plans for ACP participants.
2.	Support for Public WiFi Networks:
•	Funding could be directed toward building or expanding free public WiFi networks in underserved or low-income areas.
•	Partnerships with libraries, schools, and community centers could provide broader access.
3.	Incentives for Providers:
•	The government may incentivize internet service providers (ISPs), including Starlink, to offer ACP-compliant plans with free or low-cost internet in rural or remote areas.

Integration with Starlink

Starlink, a satellite internet provider by SpaceX, can play a critical role in extending coverage to rural and remote areas where traditional ISPs are unavailable. Policies may involve:
• Discounted Starlink Equipment Costs: Current ACP provisions allow one-time discounts of $100 on devices. Policies might expand this to cover Starlink hardware (e.g., $599 for the base kit) for eligible households.
• Expanded Subsidies: Policies could provide higher subsidies for satellite internet costs in regions where terrestrial broadband is impractical.
• Partnerships: Starlink could collaborate with federal or state programs to deliver community-wide satellite WiFi networks.

Challenges and Considerations

1.	Cost Management:
•	Satellite internet is often more expensive than traditional broadband. Scaling subsidies to match Starlink’s costs could strain budgets.
2.	Technical Constraints:
•	Bandwidth limitations and network congestion in satellite systems may impact the feasibility of providing free, high-speed internet on a large scale.
3.	Equity and Accessibility:
•	Ensuring fair distribution of benefits across rural, urban, and tribal areas will require strategic planning and coordination.

Without Starlink

If Starlink is not included, the focus may shift to:
• Fiber Deployment: Expanding fiber-optic networks to rural areas through federal and state investments.
• Fixed Wireless Access (FWA): Leveraging 5G and other wireless technologies for last-mile connectivity.
• Community Networks: Supporting locally managed broadband networks as an alternative to large ISPs.

The specifics of such policies would depend on funding availability, technology infrastructure, and collaboration between federal, state, and private entities. Would you like a deeper dive into any specific aspect?

1 Like

This is a good idea but I’m afraid it invites the government to over step and take away our freedoms and give the government more control. Did you know there are over 450 “federal agencies”? Since the beginning of government that is about 2+ new agencies a year, and no o e know what half of them are or what they do!

Also, where is the funding coming from? More taxes? Nothing is free ever, money has to come from SOMEWHERE or should I say someone. Give the money back to the Americans!

Erin,
Thanks for sharing your concerns. It wouldn’t be mandatory for those who wish to pay their own fees for WiFi and may even require some additional documentation.

I like the idea to have free wifi as long as it doesnt harm people, their health, or is a tool for spying, survallance, or malicious activity. I believe people can have it as an option if they dont want to use service providers.

Definitely not as a way to track it’s users. It’s an updated version with access to more citizens and or cities, based on ACP.