Fiscal Responsibility and Accountability Act

Purpose:

To introduce a mechanism that ensures fiscal responsibility among elected representatives by tying their eligibility for re-election to the nation’s economic performance, specifically the budget deficit relative to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

Key Provisions:

  1. Deficit Threshold:
  • Establish a legal threshold where if the federal budget deficit exceeds 3% of the nation’s GDP in any fiscal year, all sitting members of Congress become ineligible for re-election.
  1. Eligibility for Re-election:
  • This ineligibility would apply to any member of Congress who served during the fiscal year in which the deficit threshold was breached. Members not seeking re-election, or those in their final term due to term limits, would be exempt from this rule.
  1. Fiscal Year Definition:
  • The fiscal year would be defined as the period from October 1 to September 30, aligning with the federal fiscal calendar.
  1. GDP Measurement:
  • The GDP used for calculation would be the most recent estimate provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis or another recognized federal agency at the time of budget approval.
  1. Implementation:
  • The legislation would require an independent body, akin to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), to verify the deficit calculations against GDP figures annually.

  • This body would notify Congress within 30 days after the fiscal year ends if the threshold has been exceeded.

  1. Exceptions and Safeguards:
  • Exceptions could be made for deficit increases due to emergency spending, like natural disasters or national defense, but these would require a supermajority vote in both houses to approve the exemption.

  • A safeguard mechanism would allow for a temporary suspension of this rule during times of national crisis or economic downturn, requiring specific criteria to be met and a significant majority vote.

  1. Public Reporting:
  • Mandate public reporting on the fiscal health of the nation, including how close or how far the deficit is from the 3% threshold, to keep the electorate informed.
  1. Constitutional Concerns:
  • Address potential constitutional issues by ensuring that this law does not infringe on the right to vote or run for office, but rather sets a condition based on economic performance which is a legitimate legislative concern.
  1. Amendments and Oversight:
  • Allow for amendments to this law by future Congresses under strict conditions, ensuring that any changes do not undermine the original intent of fiscal responsibility.

  • Establish an oversight committee to review the fiscal impacts of legislation before it’s passed, which could predict potential breaches of the 3% deficit threshold.

Rationale:

  • Incentive for Fiscal Discipline: This proposal aims to incentivize fiscal responsibility among legislators by making their political futures directly dependent on their economic stewardship.

  • Addressing Public Sentiment: Posts on X have expressed sentiments in favor of such measures, indicating public support for accountability in government spending.

  • Precedent for Fiscal Control: It draws inspiration from Warren Buffett’s noted remark on ending the deficit, which has been widely discussed as a simple yet effective method to enforce fiscal discipline.

  • Economic Stability: By linking re-election eligibility to fiscal health, the proposal encourages policies that maintain or improve economic stability, potentially reducing the risk of long-term debt accumulation.

Conclusion:

This legislative proposal would represent a significant shift in how Congress manages the federal budget, promoting a culture of accountability and potentially leading to more sustainable fiscal policies. By aligning the interests of lawmakers with the economic well-being of the nation, it seeks to ensure that the public’s representatives are motivated to act in the country’s long-term interest rather than short-term political gains.

1 Like

Great job of laying everything out. I came to give a much simpler idea of what I think needs to be done; yours is far more comprehensive.

Major points I’d like to cover would be how to establish a budget for each agency, each committee, each congressman. I’m sure it’s an over-simplification of the needs, but I’d start with basics.

I would look at budgets for the past “x” number of years, take an average, reduce it by 10-25%. No more “if you don’t spend it, you lose it”. Cut out or greatly reduce the perks. No more private salons and beauty shops; no more exclusive gyms; no more voting their own pay raises; no more funding their health insurance coverage; no more flexible hours for sessions. Make their sessions 5 days a week from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. or something that keeps them doing business in the daylight hours, not taking votes at 2 a.m. They can do like normal people do and return phone calls and write letters before 10 or after 4. If they miss more than “x” number of sessions in a quarter, they’re ineligible to run again. Make them balance their budget quarterly and submit their expenditures for audit. Yes, we may have to pay for extra accountants or hire outside vendors to handle the budget reviews; that would have to be weighed against other cost-cutting options, but at least give it a look.

1 Like