FDA Total Particle Toxicity Inclusion

Currently the FDA holds functional flaws, and is no longer a for safety organization, it is even clearly identified on the FDA website in rules and policy making that all rules and policies are chosen and selected for enforcement based on a FOR PROFIT SYSTEM. This policy suggestion aims to provide a new method to improve the general health and welfare by restructuring the core approval methods of the FDA to include a new calculation method for total particle toxicity levels in every day use products by incorporating the basic levels of toxins found in all products for daily use.

A basic break down of particle toxicity as an inclusive model for product use:

How does particle toxicity function?

Your body has the ability to remove X amount of toxins daily, and to do this it must expend resources and energy to do so, it also needs time to expel them from the body. In a general sense this includes every thing that you place on the body, in the body, through various methods of intake such as, washing, brushing, breathing, consuming. While the body is constantly taking in particles of toxins, it is also constantly filtering them and removing them. Your body can only remove and filter a certain amount so the intake values must remain significantly below that value to prevent toxin build up. Toxin build up occurs when the toxins accumulation is greater per day then the body has the ability to remove. Currently a total application of particle toxicity is not applied, at this time FDA allows X amount of toxins in a product, if that product falls below the maximum allowed ppm for use then it is ok, but this PPM is not included with other toxins, such as water, so if you brushed your teeth with fluoride, then drank a glass of water (gallon of water and 3 brushes a day is what is recommended for daily use) you would greatly exceed the amount of toxins by PPM that you should intake daily. This allowed amount is also not included for an infant, pets such as a cat or dog and giving water from from the tap would already exceed this number. Heavy metals, chemicals would all be included in this counter.

To get an idea of the basics of this concept in numbers you consider:
If the body can remove 200,000(example only) particles of toxins each day, then the products applied or consumed must remain below this amount.
So each day you intake 180,000(example only) particles of toxins and the body maintains a healthy and toxin neutral environment.
If the body absorption or intake is above that daily value you begin to accumulate toxins each day. If you assign this value at 250,000 particles of toxins each day of intake. Then add this for a 30 day period and then a 1 year period it becomes easy to see how this can create health issues. So lets do this now.
50,000 particle toxins for 30 days is 1,500,000 particle toxins in a 30 day period.
Now lets do this over a 1 year period.
18,200,000 particle toxins over a 1 year period.
(Note: this is the general idea, numbers are for examples.)

The greater the value of excess particle toxins, promotes and even creates serious permanent and life threatening health conditions, it depletes immune system of valuable resources, minerals, vitamins, proteins and energy. Cells and biological components become fatigued and just as the body gets tired, cells do as well when overworked (Cellular Fatigue).

How can this be applied to promote stable health and welfare through the FDA.

So this method of total particle toxicity would be used to structure the amount of particles an average person would intake through daily uses products such as toothpaste, water, shampoo, soaps, food meals in an effort to protect and prevent this excessive particle toxicity from accumulating in the body and degrading public health.

To do this we would require the FDA to apply a function that gives products a toxicity rating number based on the chemicals considered toxins, PFAS, and others that fall within this category. It would be required that products approve for the market that are intended for daily use, such as TOOTHPASTE(example) to be included with the daily use and PPM values of other daily use products such as WATER. To ensure that all daily use products when combined under this TOTAL particle toxicity valuation do not create or exceed a daily limits the body can remove. This is to ensure that Excessive Particle Toxicity does not begin to stack upon itself and degrade the health of the consumers and public that uses them.

If daily use products are:
Toothpaste
Water
Food
Soap/Shampoo

Then each of this products would be included. (List is an example for basic understanding.)

Products that could be consumed by infants and toddles would be required to maintain a stricture particle toxicity limit because these products could be consumed by toddlers or persons not considered full adult size. This would include water, as baby formula is also often dehydrated.

So this policy would include all of the following:
Total Particle Toxicity values for DAILY use products to include all DAILY use products. (Example: Gallon of Water + toothpaste + Shampoo + Soap)

Products that could be consumed by infants or toddlers to hold a Particle Toxicity value under the assumption they could and would be consumed by children, infants, or little people. (Note: The body of these persons, can handle less total toxins per day and removes less then others.)

New valuation of Particle Toxicity for products which rates that product based on the total number of toxins found.

(Example:(Total toxin limit is 15) than rating a product as 1 toxicity level but it is intended for use 3 times a day, making its rating 3. Daily use of this product leave you with 12, if shampoo is rated at 2 and is intended for 1 time use, this rating remains 2 and this would leave you with 10. Water, if rated at 3 per gallon (due to heavy metals, fluoride) recommended daily intake is gallon per day. This leaves you with 7. This way the public can quickly access and determine the safety of a product at the time of purchase based on their own personal choices, with well defined methods for educated consent.)

Use of this method for FDA applications would greatly increase health and welfare of the people.

1 Like

That’s interesting and would certainly move us closer to the goal post. But why are some things like flouride even added to products when they don’t need to be–like drinking water, and toothpaste. Have you ever seen a toddler brush and not swallow the toothpaste? If for some reason a person needs flouride (I can’t think of a good reason for someone consuming this poison) there are other ways to get it without exposing everyone to it through daily use products. Can’t we do more to eliminate toxins in the stream of consumer products, municipal water supplies, industrial emissions to our air, etc? For those that cannot be eliminated, then adding the rating system above would help individuals figure out a way to make sure they are monitoring their own balance of toxic intake.

2 Likes

I feel it revolves around treatments and not cures, dentists make allot of money, pharmaceutical companies also make allot of money to not cure but create temporary solutions that require constant uptake which promotes profits. Consider the fact that fluoride is a neurotoxin just like lead, it really should not be present at all. It stands to reason that unethical practices are being presented by those who practice medical and dental healthcare. Removing these toxins all together is needed. Regardless, if they are removed or not, there are many other toxins present not just these, its important to give people a logical and reasonable way to make educated consent.

1 Like

Eliminate fluoride from drinking water immediately. Refine drinking water standards. Eliminate carcinogens, Chemicals and bacteria from drinking water. We have water plants that do not do their job. Plain and simple.

There are simple methods that can be used to purify water, and maintain purification, but I agree any use of a neurotoxin should be removed. They will of course argue that this is the purpose of that toxin. A standard of living and even building should apply a more fundamental ability to maintain and remove organisms from the water, light and heat are some functions that should be considered.
I am aware of very simple methods to do this, but I make it a point not to create functions that produce loss of life.

We do not need to use neurotoxins at all. This includes in any product.