Family Law Accountability and Reform Act

Liberty Justice
, , , ,
1

The Family Law Accountability and Reform Act seeks to align family court procedures with those of criminal courts, emphasizing strict adherence to constitutional and ethical standards. This policy focuses on enhancing oversight of family law judges and legal professionals to ensure fair and just treatment. Key reforms include:

  1. Judicial Oversight and Accountability:

    • Establish independent review boards to oversee family law judges’ decisions and practices. These boards will investigate complaints, ensuring rulings adhere to constitutional and ethical standards.

  2. Public Defender System for Family Law:

    • Provide a public defender system for family law cases to ensure all individuals have access to legal representation, leveling the playing field for those unable to afford private attorneys.

  3. Criminal Court-Like Procedures:

    • Implement strict, standardized procedures similar to those in criminal courts, including rigorous checks on evidence and witness testimony, ensuring decisions are based on facts and fairness.

  4. Ethical Training and Certification for Guardians:

    • Require guardians ad litem and other court-appointed representatives to undergo rigorous training and certification to ensure they act in the best interest of families and children without financial exploitation.

  5. Public Reporting and Feedback Mechanisms:

    • Create a system for public reporting and feedback on judges and court-appointed professionals, promoting transparency and accountability in their actions and decisions.

By mirroring the procedural rigor of criminal courts, the Family Law Accountability and Reform Act aims to restore integrity and trust in the family law system, ensuring all families receive fair and just treatment.

2 Likes
2

How about we create a law that requires they follow the LAW; The Supreme Law we are all bound to and that of the Laws of Nature and Natures God.

5 CFR § 2635.101 Basic obligation of public service.

(a) Public service is a public trust. Each employee has a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens to place loyalty to the Constitution, laws, and ethical principles above private gain. To ensure that every citizen can have complete confidence in the integrity of the Federal Government, each employee must respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct set forth in this section, as well as the implementing standards contained in this part and in supplemental agency regulations.

18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108

Stat Article III. Section 2. of the Constitution for the United States of America says, “In all cases in which a state shall be party the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction.”

So, when a state brings an accusation against you, through any one of its agents, the state no longer has jurisdiction and the state judge has a mandatory, non-waivable, self executing, non discretionary DUTY to recuse himself and failure to do so means that the judge is acting without jurisdiction and committing the crime of treason.

Love you all Keep up the fight!!!

1 Like
3
  • DV victims and protective parents of abused children should be able to request a criminal investigator who reviews all evidence and creates a report based on the likelihood on the truth of the allegations. This criminal investigator shall NOT act as a custody mediator or include custody recommendations in the report.
  • Allow DV victims and protective parents to seek protective orders directly from the police department, or make that process easier.
  • Require judges and mediators to be educated regarding primary attachment theory, and to prioritize schedules which are age/developmentally appropriate and reflect primary attachment theory/knowledge.
  • Remove all concepts or references to parental time “PERCENTAGES.” One parent should be marked as the primary residential parent and the other parent is the nonresidential parent…… Too many people, usually noncustodial fathers, fight so hard in family court, not necessarily for the best schedule, or to gain the most quality parenting time, but to artificially inflate the parental timeshare "percentage”, even if that time increase primarily covers time when the child is at school or sleeping. Time-share percentages distracts parents from focusing on what the best schedule should be, and makes parents focus more on a number or the child support, keeps parents in a frenzy and in and out of family court. I also think that many custodial parents might be afraid to offer extra visitation time out of fear that the other parent will use it against them to reduce the “percentage.”
  • Institute firm preventative measures and training against litigation abuse.
  • Custody mediator meetings must be RECORDED and all information included must be verified as accurate BEFORE the report is made.