Expanding Mental Health Support for School-Aged Children

Health
,
1

Expanding Mental Health Support for School-Aged Children

Executive Summary

The mental health crisis among children and adolescents is worsening, with studies indicating alarming rates of anxiety, depression, and other behavioral health disorders in young children. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services reports that nearly 20% of children have a diagnosable mental health condition, with a significant portion going untreated. This policy outlines a strategy to address the growing demand for mental health services for school-aged children, starting as early as the first grade, by expanding access to Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) and certified mental health therapists in schools. It includes provisions for fair compensation for therapists, affordable access to care for families, and a comprehensive funding model incorporating both private and public insurers.

The Need for Expanded Access to Mental Health Support

Mental Health Crisis Among Children

According to the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), 13% of children aged 5–17 are experiencing significant mental health challenges. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) further indicates that 1 in 6 U.S. children aged 6–17 experiences a mental health disorder each year. Unfortunately, over 50% of children with mental health conditions go untreated due to insufficient access to trained professionals .

Early Intervention is Critical

Research shows that early intervention can have a profound impact on a child’s development and lifelong mental health outcomes. Identifying and treating mental health issues early—beginning in first grade—can reduce the likelihood of more severe mental health problems later in life. The World Health Organization (WHO) states that half of all mental health disorders begin by age 14. Early access to LCSWs and certified mental health therapists can mitigate the long-term consequences of untreated mental health issues .

Policy Proposals

1. School-Based Mental Health Access Starting in First Grade

All public and private schools should employ or contract at least one LCSW or certified mental health therapist per 300 students. This ratio is recommended by the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) as a best practice for managing mental health services. Services should be made available to students starting in first grade, with special attention to early identification of mental health concerns.

2. Fair Compensation for Mental Health Professionals

To attract and retain qualified professionals, this policy mandates a minimum starting salary of $60,000 per year for LCSWs and certified mental health therapists, with cost-of-living adjustments annually. Ensuring competitive wages will help prevent burnout and turnover while maintaining high-quality mental health care in schools.

3. Minimizing Costs to Patients

To minimize the financial burden on families, mental health services provided in schools should be fully covered by private insurance, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). A sliding-scale payment model should be implemented for families without insurance, ensuring that no child is denied access to care based on their family’s financial situation.

Funding and Insurance Models

1. Private Insurance

Private insurance providers, regulated under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, must include school-based mental health services in their coverage. This act ensures that mental health services are covered at the same rate as physical health services. This policy would require insurers to fully cover mental health services provided by school-based LCSWs and therapists as part of their pediatric care services.

2. Public Insurance (Medicaid & CHIP)

Medicaid and CHIP already cover mental health services for children under 21 through the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit. This policy would expand coverage to ensure full reimbursement for school-based mental health services. States would receive federal matching funds for expanding their Medicaid programs to cover the salaries and benefits of school-based mental health professionals.

3. Cost Burden to Insurers

The cost burden to insurers is expected to be manageable due to the long-term savings from early intervention. According to a study published by JAMA Pediatrics, each dollar spent on mental health services saves $7 in future healthcare costs, as untreated mental health conditions often lead to chronic illness, increased emergency room visits, and hospitalization .

Implementation Strategy

1. Workforce Development and Training

Federal grants should be provided to universities and training institutions to expand graduate programs for social work and mental health counseling. In addition, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) should allocate more funding for scholarships and loan forgiveness programs to encourage more students to pursue careers in mental health, particularly in underserved areas.

2. Partnerships Between Schools and Health Agencies

Schools should form partnerships with local health agencies and clinics to ensure that mental health professionals in schools are integrated into broader healthcare networks. This would allow for seamless referrals, continuity of care, and access to additional services for children requiring more intensive mental health interventions.

3. Funding Pathway Through SAMHSA

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) should provide grant funding through its Project AWARE (Advancing Wellness and Resilience in Education) program to states and school districts. These funds should be used to hire LCSWs and certified mental health therapists in schools, focusing on early intervention and prevention services.

Societal and Economic Benefits of a Mentally Healthier Population

A mentally healthier population results in:

•	Improved academic performance: Students with access to mental health services demonstrate better attendance, behavior, and academic outcomes.
•	Reduced healthcare costs: According to the World Economic Forum, untreated mental health disorders cost the global economy over $1 trillion annually in lost productivity .
•	Increased workforce productivity: Mentally healthy individuals are more likely to graduate, gain stable employment, and contribute to society economically.

Lobbying Plan

1. Identifying Key Lawmakers

Key lawmakers who should be lobbied include:

•	Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), a strong advocate for children’s mental health services.
•	Representative Grace Napolitano (D-CA), who has introduced multiple bills focusing on school-based mental health.
•	Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) and Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), both leaders in mental health parity legislation.
•	Representative Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which oversees health issues.
•	Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee.

2. Legislative Pathway

•	Introduction of a Bipartisan Bill: A bill focusing on expanding school-based mental health services should be introduced in the House and Senate.
•	Appropriations Through SAMHSA: The bill would need to secure funding through SAMHSA’s discretionary budget, specifically under the Project AWARE initiative and other mental health grant programs.
•	Lobbying Key Committees: The bill should be lobbied in the Senate HELP Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Coordination with the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies is also critical for securing long-term funding.

Conclusion

This policy provides a comprehensive framework to address the mental health crisis facing school-aged children by increasing access to LCSWs and certified mental health therapists starting in first grade. By providing fair compensation for mental health professionals, minimizing costs to patients, and leveraging public and private insurers, this policy can create a sustainable model for mental health care in schools. The long-term societal and economic benefits of a mentally healthier population far outweigh the upfront costs, making this investment a crucial step toward a healthier and more productive future.

Sources:

1.	National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
2.	Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
3.	Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)
4.	JAMA Pediatrics
5.	World Economic Forum
1 Like
2

Before we jump into funding the social work field, there should be a comprehensive evaluation of its efficacy, does it truly improve mental health? What therapies are most effective? How is efficacy measured? One often missing component which is critically important when it comes to child health and development is attention to the impact screen time has on natural psychological, social and neurological development.

3

Thank you for raising such thoughtful questions about this important issue. We wholeheartedly agree that before implementing any policy, especially one that could have a lasting impact on children, it’s crucial to evaluate the effectiveness and quality of the services provided.

Your point on the qualifications and role of Licensed Clinical Social Workers (LCSWs) in mental health is also very valid. LCSWs are rigorously trained, often holding master’s degrees in social work with extensive clinical hours in child and adolescent development. Many have specialized skills in evidence-based therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Play Therapy, and Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT), all of which have been shown to be highly effective for school-aged children when applied appropriately. These therapies not only address symptoms but also aim to develop resilience, coping skills, and emotional regulation in children, all critical to their overall mental and emotional growth.

Regarding your concern about screen time, we couldn’t agree more. Excessive screen time can have significant negative effects on psychological, social, and neurological development, and addressing this issue is essential. Our approach is very much about creating balance—promoting therapy and counseling methods that emphasize real-life interactions and personal growth while advocating for reduced screen exposure where possible. Ideally, therapy sessions would encourage children to engage in active, creative, and in-person experiences that enhance their development rather than add to their screen time.

We appreciate your insights, as they align closely with our vision for a holistic, comprehensive approach to supporting mental health in children. With your input, we can ensure that policies consider not only the quality of care provided by mental health professionals but also the broader lifestyle factors influencing child development.

4

Thank you for your response. In terms of effectiveness, how does one measure the impact of therapy on children’s wellbeing? In other words, as a social program, what are ways in which we would be able to measure success of that program?

More research needs to be included in the education of social workers. Many institutions provide more emphasis on diversity and inclusion than they do on the science that should be guiding their future work.

In addition to the dangers of screen time on childhood development, nutrition is vital to health. If you are implementing a holistic program, addressing not only nutritional needs but also addressing the dangers of chemicals and artificial ingredients in the food supply that impact healthy development is essential.

5

Measuring the effectiveness of therapy for children’s well-being, especially in a social program setting, involves using both qualitative and quantitative methods to capture changes in emotional, behavioral, and social outcomes. Here are some of the key metrics and approaches that are commonly used:
1. Standardized Assessments: Tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) or the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) provide structured ways to evaluate changes in children’s mental health over time. These assessments are often completed by parents, teachers, or even the children themselves, depending on age and maturity, and are administered at the beginning of therapy and at set intervals.
2. Goal Achievement Scaling: This method tailors therapy goals to the child’s specific needs and tracks progress based on individualized benchmarks. For example, if a child enters therapy to improve social skills or reduce anxiety, specific goals—such as participating in group activities or showing fewer signs of distress—are set and measured over time.
3. Teacher and Parent Reports: Gathering feedback from those who observe children in their day-to-day environments offers insights into behavioral changes. Teachers and parents can report on the child’s social interactions, ability to focus, and emotional responses, giving a comprehensive view of the child’s progress in real-life settings.
4. School Performance and Attendance: Improvements in academic performance, school attendance, and classroom behavior can indirectly signal a child’s improved mental well-being. Tracking these metrics helps to identify whether therapeutic interventions are positively influencing the child’s ability to engage and succeed in school.
5. Self-Reports from Older Children and Adolescents: As children grow older, they can provide valuable insights into their own emotional states and coping skills. Tools like the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) allow children to self-report on various aspects of their well-being, from emotional health to social functioning.
6. Behavioral Observations and Case Notes: Therapists and social workers document observed changes during sessions, such as the child’s engagement in activities, their ability to express emotions, and changes in social interactions. This qualitative data helps to provide a nuanced view of the child’s progress.
7. Longitudinal Studies and Follow-Up Assessments: By assessing children at intervals after completing therapy, programs can gather data on the long-term impact of interventions. This follow-up allows for an evaluation of the sustained effects on mental health and social development.

Each of these metrics helps paint a fuller picture of a program’s success by capturing both objective outcomes and subjective improvements in children’s lives. A successful program is one where children not only exhibit positive shifts in behavior and emotional regulation but also continue to thrive academically, socially, and personally in the months and years following intervention.

6

Excellent! Standardized assessment, tracking, follow-up and longitudinal data collection and analysis. It’s important to monitor rate of success. Thank you for taking the time to answer questions.
Hopefully we can work towards the root causes which negatively impact child development and find ourselves in a position where children are safer, stronger, healthier and happier in the coming years.

7

Child developmental therapist here. Unfortunately, the behavioral methods you mentioned do not support social-emotional learning in children. We need to be focusing more on social-emotional health and not isolated skills. Current research shows the efficacy of supporting emotional regulation in children through the context of relationships within the home. Nurturing parent-child relationships should be a priority, but I haven’t found any suggested policies targeting this topic. This area with your mentioned real-life situations would support the learning for the social-emotional child

2 Likes
8

I agree. As a child development therapists specializing in social-emotional learning I believe we have to look at the current research. Studies are showing children need play-based interventions that support parent-child relationships. Social workers are great, but the majority do not have training in how to nurture families using play-based interventions.

2 Likes