Address the voting disparity between Urban and Rural population. Urban population is determining policies for the rural population by means of “mob rules”. Rural population has no representation under the state political system.
This kind of thing would need to be implemented at the state level. Doing it at the federal level is massive federal overreach.
But isn’t that what the DEMS want- Federal over reach - Policy Proposal: County-Based Electoral College System for States
Objective:
To establish a more equitable representation system within states that ensures all regions, including rural areas, have a significant voice in state-level decision-making and influence over national elections.
Policy Overview:
-
Introduction of a State-Level Electoral College:
- Each county within a state is allocated electoral votes based on a balanced formula that considers population, geographic size, and economic contributions.
- This system ensures that smaller, rural counties have a voice proportional to their importance, preventing major metropolitan areas from dominating state elections.
-
Allocation of Electoral Votes:
- Base Allocation: Each county receives a minimum number of electoral votes to ensure representation.
- Proportional Adjustment: Additional votes are distributed based on population, with caps to prevent overly populous counties from overwhelming smaller ones.
- Economic and Geographic Adjustments: Consideration is given to economic contributions (e.g., agriculture, manufacturing) and geographic size to recognize the diverse value counties bring to the state.
-
Election Outcomes:
- In state elections, the candidate winning the majority of a county’s votes secures that county’s electoral votes.
- The state winner is determined by the majority of county electoral votes, not the raw popular vote.
-
Implementation in Presidential Elections:
- States using the county-based electoral college system allocate their electoral votes for the presidency based on the outcome of their internal county electoral results. This allows for more granular representation of the state’s overall decision.
Rationale:
- Balanced Representation: A county-based system prevents the interests of urban areas from overshadowing rural needs and perspectives.
- Fairness Across Regions: This system ensures all counties have a stake in state governance and national influence, fostering unity across diverse communities.
- Economic and Cultural Inclusion: It values contributions beyond population density, acknowledging the significance of rural industries and cultural heritage.
Challenges and Solutions:
-
Challenge: Opposition from urban centers citing reduced influence.
- Solution: Maintain proportional adjustments to reflect population while ensuring baseline representation for smaller counties.
-
Challenge: Complexity in implementation and public understanding.
- Solution: Launch public education campaigns and phased implementation with pilot programs in interested states.
Conclusion:
A county-based electoral college system can bridge the divide between rural and urban communities, ensuring every region’s voice matters. This approach creates a more balanced and inclusive framework, fostering a sense of fairness and unity across states.