Eliminate Social Security Maximum Benefit Limits for Families with Special Needs Dependents

Overview

Currently, the Social Security maximum benefits for families with an adult child who has a disability (that began before the age of 22) amounts to 50% of the parent’s full retirement benefit, which is equal to the spouses’ benefit. This amount applies whether the parent retires or becomes disabled. In the event of the parent’s death, the amount is 100% for a spouse and 75% for the special needs dependent.

Issues

There is a maximum benefit limit which restricts a family to between 150% - 188% of the parent’s full retirement amount. When a family includes a spouse and three or more special needs dependents, the formula likely results in less than what they may receive from the (Social Security Administration) Supplemental Security Income (SSI)—in which case, the difference between the dependents’ share of a family maximum Social Security benefit and their SSI is still covered by SSI.

Unfortunately, instead of being able to completely transfer to Social Security, which imposes no resource limits, the dependent remains bound by SSI’s rules and requirements.

At present, a person on SSI can have no more than $2,000 so must ensure their bank account is spent down each month before the next month’s SSI deposit is received. If an excess of money is in their account, the penalties are severe. Instead of just returning the excess, the person loses the entire month's deposit.

This makes it impossible for the person to have the dignity and independence of their own savings account to enable them to pay cash for a sizable purchase such as a new mattress, extensive dental work, dentures, eyeglasses, or the proverbial unexpected “rainy day” event. Instead, they must rely on going into debt or doing without necessities.

Since the ABLE account is not locally available, access to funds is complicated and subject to approval. Additionally, the program involves fees which further reduces the person’s meager resources.

My Proposal - Help Families & Reduce Government

Eliminate the family maximum so those with multiple qualifying dependents are able to receive the same 50% (or 75%) amount of the parent’s retirement benefit as smaller families do. This would simplify their lives as they would no longer need to partake in SSI in order to make ends meet. The proposed change would free these families from needless rules and regulations apparently designed for no other purpose than to keep exceptionally challenged people subjected to forced poverty.

My proposal would also provide government an opportunity to lessen the caseload for SSI, allow a reduction in the size of the department, cut staffing costs, reduce bureaucracy by the elimination of a duplication of service, and improve overall efficiency. Furthermore, it would empower and better serve exceptionally challenged Americans.

3 Likes

One question. Who would finance this? We have no issue with this, but with the fact that there will be massive government downsize and tax need cuts, how would this be financed? If it comes from the government, it’s going to be a tax. Where will that money come from, especially with so many new dependents in the last couple years?

The money is already in place. Presently, part of the funds are distributed through Social Security and the rest via SSI. My suggestion removes SSI from the equation while realizing cost savings.

Another thing that would make this much easier to finance would be to cut dependents. Social Security was never meant to be hereditary. An ex of mine has been receiving this because her father was on it before he passed. At that time, she was a minor so I get why the payments continued. However, she’s 44 years old now and STILL getting them. There is no way she should still be on it. There’s much more money to be made from a job and we willingly support jobs because we all need the products or services provided by them. Time to chop the extra dependents and shrink down to just those in legitimate cannot-work need.

1 Like

Unless a dependent meets the criteria of having a legitimate disability, they ought to age-out of the program once they reach the age of 18 and/or graduate from high school. If this isn’t happening already, a change is warranted.

Great proposal! I have submitted a proposal to increase asset allowance and create a safety net for disabled (SSI recipients) to work if possible.

https://forum.policiesforpeople.com/t/provide-a-safety-net-for-ssi-disability-recipients-to-work/18370

Thanks for the kind words, Vicki. Your proposal is well thought out and spot on. I'll vote for and bookmark yours to keep in touch.

Moms are the best advocates.

1 Like

Spending cuts. Taking care of homeland issues before overseas. Our people, vets, their mental health are priority should be priority over others wars and luxury spending. To find out that illegal migrants are getting $3k a month for culture sensitive food was a real kick in the teeth when i am not allowed to have more than $2k in the bank, marry, or work per diem for fear of losing my benefits. If people really knew where their taxes went they’d stop paying them. Likely narcan for paramedics is more expensive than SSA.