Do we own our bodies or do the big corporations

The 4th Amendment protects our right to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, and prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. It requires warrants to be issued only upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and specifically describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. There are concerns that people have been intentionally exposed to contaminants through chemtrails, food, water, medications, and the air. There are claims that individuals have been implanted with nanotechnology and other unknown hardware and have been tracked by corporations and others without consent. To address this, it is important for Congress to pass legislation that criminalizes any entity from accessing technology inside a person’s body without their explicit knowledge and consent. It is argued that if a tech company implants technology into a person, that person becomes the property of the company. However, this argument is flawed. Just as eating a hamburger does not make you the property of McDonald’s, the technology inside of an individual belongs to that individual, not the company that manufactured it. The sanctity of the person cannot be overridden by technology. To prevent the encroachment of transhumanism, Congress must create laws that make unauthorized access to technology within a person a criminal offense, with severe penalties for violators.

2 Likes

Policies proposals to address this:

  1. Policy to Establish the Separation of the Corporatocracy and the State
  2. The Pharmaceutical Accountability and Transparency Act (PATA)
1 Like