Create a Cap and Trade system for healthy v. Unhealthy food (akin to the carbon system )

● Promoting Healthy Eating Through a Cap-and-Trade System for Food

While I am not advocating for the traditional “carbon” cap-and-trade system, I believe we can draw inspiration from it to create a similar framework for FOOD. By implementing such a system, we could significantly promote healthy eating habits without imposing any costs on U.S. revenue, ultimately saving 100’s of billions in healthcare expenses.

● The Current Food Pricing Dilemma

In today’s market, the price disparity between healthy and unhealthy food options is stark. For instance, a slice of salmon or a bag of romaine lettuce can cost anywhere from $5 to $8, while a family-sized bag of potato chips or a hot dog with soda may only cost around $2. This pricing structure forces many individuals, particularly those from middle and lower-income backgrounds, to make unhealthy dietary choices— before we even consider snacking.

● The Proposed Solution

To illustrate the concept, consider the pricing of regular and diet Coke. Currently, both are priced at $1. Under this proposed system, the price of regular Coke would increase to $1.50. This increase would then subsidize diet Coke, reducing its price to just $0.50.Similarly, if the price of a hot dog and soda were to rise to $4 or $6, the price of a healthy slice of salmon could decrease to between $3 and $4. This adjustment would make it easier for consumers to choose healthier meals over less nutritious options.

● A Choice-Driven Approach

Importantly, this system does not prohibit anyone from eating whatever they wish; it will not create “food dictators.” Instead, it simply flips the financial incentives from unhealthy foods to healthier options. Consumers will still have the freedom to choose their meals while benefiting from a pricing structure that encourages healthier eating habits.

● Scoring Food Items

To implement this system effectively, all food items would be scored based on their nutritional content, specifically focusing on sugars, unhealthy ingredients, preservatives, and artificial coloring—factors that are already disclosed in nutrition facts. This scoring system would facilitate trade-offs between food items, encouraging consumers to opt for healthier choices.

● Encouraging Healthier Production Practices

Moreover, this initiative would incentivize food producers to prioritize health and nutrition in their products rather than focusing solely on aesthetics or marketing gimmicks. By shifting the emphasis towards healthier ingredients and nutritional value, we can foster a food environment that supports better health outcomes for everyone.

All “diet” drinks should be banned due to their ingredients.

This sytem doesnt “prohibit” anyone from eating anything they wish, it only flips the financial benefits from the unhealty to the healthy foods.

I may agree with you on that, but that was just an illustration. When scoring the foods there can be many inputs based on medical research.