Angie,
I understand your point about showing the positive aspects of vaccines in food products, And we can probably find positive aspects to anything and everything on the planet and write both Pro and Con arguments against them, right?
What I would argue both for and against in your post, is that you supplied what I think is only HALF of the issue regarding food safety and security. As you know, we cannot make proper policy based on half of an issue. I don’t mean to sound critical, however, for the sake of debate, I must also include the following in a public forum regarding your points.
My question is this. Since we know that vaccines in food products can be beneficial, and assuming that one agrees with all of your points, where are your points on safety, regarding the use of food vaccines? Is this simply being assumed? You mention the potential pitfalls of famine and disease by not using food vaccines, yet you don’t mention how these food vaccines can be administered and controlled in such a manner that the hazards to humans and livestock approaches zero. Nothing is there. Isn’t a large part of using vaccines in foods aimed at promoting health and food security? If so, where are the points to ensure this goal, especially when vaccines products are rushed to market in a highly competitive pharmaceutical industry, corporations are more focused on pushing the highest meat-to-market ratios per business quarter, stores pushing for the highest turnover monthly, and overworked farmers are more concerned about meeting Ag quotas instead of worrying about the health and safety of their fellow man. Is all of this assumed to be addressed in your post?
I don’t think people are doubting your points about the potential benefits of this technology…I think they are more worried about those points that I just mentioned, and do not trust that it will work in an ideological and perfect way, like what might be assumed at this point. The call for a ban is because there is no faith in our current system (especially during recent COVID mass genocide spike protein poisoning attempts that are pushed on the population even as we speak ) that it will work to promote health, food abundance, and prosperity, as it is currently being sold. With our current corrupt system in place (all governments included), there is no better alternative to public health and safety than a complete ban on it – until corruption and carelessness is removed from the national food supply and reliable transparent safeguards are in place. We can always “unban” it later; but we will never be able to raise dead people and livestock back from the grave, later.
As analogy, it is a bit like giving a child a baseball bat and he decides to hit his sibling over the head with it. You don’t hand him back the bat again until he has matured to the point where he will not do it again. Same applies here – the bat should be taken away at this time (in the form of a ban ), until it is safe to be given back. Bans are not eternal, yet they are sometimes temporarily necessary when public safety could be at serious risk. And no matter how great food vaccines might prove themselves to be in the future (as you have shown), today’s lingering mass-vaccination health risks still remain unaddressed. My two cents on it. Thanks. 
PS - To underscore the present issues that we currently face via the introduction of vaccine materials within our national food supply, I am including an example of broad-based highly toxic spike protein molecule contamination that is still ongoing, and continuing to harm the human population. This should serve as a stark warning that our society is not yet socially responsible for reaping the many potentional benefits of integrating vaccines into our fragile public food systems.