Perhaps we the people must give a thought to using some type of LLM to review a Bill and catch when more than one issue/subject/target/provison is present. Or if there is a rider snuck in at the last moment. Sometimes we humans overlook things and machines can help here.
Either way, once a review is done (be it human or machine or both) the Bill is locked and must not contain modification after that point. I’d suggest some type of official seal (digital or paper-wise) which notes the bill is reviewed on this date and anything after is null and void. No exceptions.
The reading aloud is a good point too. Then we the people can compare what is being read matches what was locked/sealed. If it does not match, the Bill is null and void and may be re-submitted at a later point.
If the non-matching addtion was intentional, the person(s) responsible for the non-match are removed from office, for life.
If the non-matching was a mistake (we are human, it happens) the person(s) responsible are penalized in some manner (that can be drawn up as these thoughts/changes progress) congruent to the severity of the non-match entry. You may only make a mistake so many times and severe infractions of this will result in removal from office, for life.
They work for the people and may find another form of work in life if they do not agree to these changes.
Thoughts?